Re: Cannot get logging to work.

2006-03-03 Thread Robin Bowes
John Peacock wrote: > As far as using the FHS file layout, I would actually just modify the > log/run file to point to the "correct" location, e.g. > > #! /bin/sh > export LOGDIR=/var/log/qpsmtpd > exec multilog t n60 $LOGDIR Personally, I always use something like this for my log run file (for a

Re: viewcvs

2006-03-03 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Mar 3, 2006, at 11:11 AM, Johannes russek wrote: it happens from time to time time today that i get an error while accessing your viewcvs at svn.perl.org: Robert moved the svn server to another box some days ago and the new box is having some trouble with mod_python. Until it's fixed,

Re: oh, and another question

2006-03-03 Thread John Peacock
Johannes russek wrote: sorry for kinda "flooding" the ML today, but i've got another question: what's the difference between the normal release and the "high perf" release? The high_perf branch was implemented by one of the primary committers (Matt Sergeant) and has already been merged to trun

Re: Cannot get logging to work.

2006-03-03 Thread John Peacock
Pelkey, Jeffery (Titan) @ TITAN wrote: Howdy! I have loaded qpsmtpd v0.31.1 and it works great with little modification! However, I do not get any logs or output except for the initial output to upon starting qpsmtpd-forkserver. It appears to be loading from the stdout: 22094 Loaded loggin

Re: PIPELINING

2006-03-03 Thread John Peacock
Johan Almqvist wrote: (and maybe we should modify qpsmtpd's behaviour to be more consistent in terms of what it returns, so as to issue 5xx's for the rest of the transaction if a DENY has been returned). Beat you to it. There is code in branches/0.3x now that disconnects any connection where

oh, and another question

2006-03-03 Thread Johannes russek
sorry for kinda "flooding" the ML today, but i've got another question: what's the difference between the normal release and the "high perf" release? is it just that the high-perf release supports pperl? regards, johannes

viewcvs

2006-03-03 Thread Johannes russek
btw, guys: it happens from time to time time today that i get an error while accessing your viewcvs at svn.perl.org: An Exception Has Occurred Python Traceback Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/web/svn/viewvc/lib/viewcvs.py", line 3571, in main request.run_viewcvs() File "/ho

Cannot get logging to work.

2006-03-03 Thread Pelkey, Jeffery \(Titan\) @ TITAN
Howdy! I have loaded qpsmtpd v0.31.1 and it works great with little modification! However, I do not get any logs or output except for the initial output to upon starting qpsmtpd-forkserver. It appears to be loading from the stdout: 22094 Loaded logging/warn 9 I have also created log directo

PIPELINING

2006-03-03 Thread Johan Almqvist
Hi I was wondering if anyone has tried to not announce PIPELINING capabilities and dumping the connection if the peer PIPELINEs anyway (similar to the earlytalker plugin)? I am asking because I note that a lot of spammers PIPELINE - I get 5xx error codes in the logs followed by 4xx codes

RE: milter plugin

2006-03-03 Thread Johannes russek
> Just out of interest (and because I haven't looked at sendmail in 10 > years [oh my god I am getting old]): what can mimedefang do that you > can't (easily) do in qpsmtpd without mimedefang? well, i think with a bit more of time for developing qpsmtpd plugins everything should be doable. though,

Re: milter plugin

2006-03-03 Thread Johan Almqvist
On Mar 3, 2006, at 18:53, Johannes russek wrote: though one pretty good reason was that it's able to use milter filters for mailscanning; that is especially in our interest as we want to use mimedefang without the need to use sendmail (which would be a pretty worse idea on a mailgateway).

milter plugin

2006-03-03 Thread Johannes russek
hi guys, we are going to use qpsmtpd in a commercial software package we are currently developing. we decided to use qpsmtpd because of the flexible perl plugin interface and the options it has already. though one pretty good reason was that it's able to use milter filters for mailscanning; that is