Re: A different angle on greylisting

2006-03-12 Thread Hanno Hecker
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 13:06:15 +1100 Gavin Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am thinking, for example, if spamassassin scores 3 or higher to > > softfail and add to the greylist database. Chances are we'll never > > see it again. If its from a real site then it should just be > > delayed t

Re: A different angle on greylisting

2006-03-12 Thread Gavin Carr
Hi Charles, On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:00:33AM +1100, Charles Butcher wrote: > I have had in the past very good results from greylisting, over 30% of > first-time rejections never come back. With it turned off we see a > major increase in spam hitting the queue. Occasionally someone says > th

A different angle on greylisting

2006-03-12 Thread Charles Butcher
Hi there, I have recently switched my site away from qmail-smtpd+forest-of-patches to qpsmtpd. We are a low-volume non-ISP site looking after a handful of domains, so we rank draconian anti-spam measures higher than performance issues. I have had in the past very good results from greylist