A ways back I got a bug report regarding the Debian qpsmtpd package regarding
the usefulness of the clamdscan plugin (mainly because the Clamd module isn't
packaged for Debian, and probably never will be). The current version depends
on Clamd; here's a partial rewrite of the plugin to use the newe
On Sep 20, 2007, at 1:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's my point. From what I can gather, the install of qpsmtpd from
trunk (at least from a few weeks ago) enables the authnull plugin
I took it out, thanks!
--
http://develooper.com/ - http://askask.com/
qpsmtpd forkserver 0.32
Is there a way to selectively turn the logging level way up, but only
during certain circumstances?
Specifically, I want to monitor a specific IP address. Right now, normal
logging shows only that it connects, does helo, turns on TLS, does helo,
then seems to timeout (no f
On 22-Sep-07, at 2:36 AM, Robert Spier wrote:
How is that header more useful? Please provide an example.
It's so you can do threshold filtering in your MUA (or in procmail).
Otherwise your MUA (or procmail) has to be able to understand numbers
in the headers.
Matt.
On 2007-09-21 23:36:47 -0700, Robert Spier wrote:
> At Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:34:12 +0200,
> Werner Fleck wrote:
> > With the attached patch applied, the spamassassin plugin adds the
> > X-Spam-Level header line to the mail, i.e. a header consisting of
> > 'X-Spam-Level: ' followed by a number of aste
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 the voices made Robert Spier write:
> How is that header more useful? Please provide an example.
It was discussed a number of years ago as part of the SA-development; it was
added for/used by people with limited mailsoftware where the filter can only do
limited matching on
Google is your friend here :)
But see e.g. http://johnbokma.com/spam/classifyingspam.html or
http://www.gsi.de/informationen/wti/it/service/spam_filter_e.html,
that's two of the 500k+ results you get from google.
Regards
Werner
Robert Spier schrieb:
How is that header more useful? Please p
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 22:34 +0200, Werner Fleck wrote:
> With the attached patch applied, the spamassassin plugin adds the
> X-Spam-Level header line to the mail, i.e. a header consisting of
> 'X-Spam-Level: ' followed by a number of asterisks '*' given by the spam
> level.
>
> With this line p
How is that header more useful? Please provide an example.
At Fri, 21 Sep 2007 22:34:12 +0200,
Werner Fleck wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> With the attached patch applied, the spamassassin plugin adds the
> X-Spam-Level header line to the mail, i.e. a header consisting of
> 'X-Spam-Level: ' followed by a n
