Re: check_badrcptto, to prevent backscatter

2011-03-11 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Mar 10, 2011, at 19:41, Chris Lewis wrote: > I think we'd be better served by coming up with, for example, a "qpsmtpd way" > of doing this sort of thing. > > For example: for basic RCPT TO functionality, have a basic RCPT time plugin > that can handle aliasing, allowable domain relays, list

Re: check_badrcptto, to prevent backscatter

2011-03-11 Thread Robert Spier
> One solution would be to add a new directory named 'backscatter' and > put both scripts in there with the same prefix (check_goodrcptto) and > with a distinguishing suffix (_postfix & _qmail). That would be clear > to people that are interested in the subject. Yes. Except backscatter isn't qui

Re: check_badrcptto, to prevent backscatter

2011-03-11 Thread Todd Brunhoff
On 3/10/2011 11:27 PM, Robert Spier wrote: Tim Meadowcroft wrote: On Thursday 10 March 2011 18:06:04 Robert Spier wrote: Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Mar 10, 2011, at 6:49, Matt Sergeant wrote: Should we have plugins/qmail and plugins/postfix dirs? I like that idea. I'm not sure I do. The

Re: check_badrcptto, to prevent backscatter

2011-03-11 Thread Tim Meadowcroft
On Friday 11 March 2011 03:41:03 Chris Lewis wrote: > I think we'd be better served by coming up with, for example, a "qpsmtpd > way" of doing this sort of thing. > > For example: for basic RCPT TO functionality, have a basic RCPT time > plugin that can handle aliasing, allowable domain relays, l