Hi Matt,
On Die 13.09.2011 11:10, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I just benchmarked Qpsmtpd vs Haraka and thought some here might find
the results interesting:
http://baudehlo.wordpress.com/2011/09/13/node-js-is-fast/
(not meant as inflammatory, obviously I still have love for Qpsmtpd)
Matt.
How
Dear listmembers,
please can you point me to the right doc, I think I have somethin
missed.
My Sysadmin have updated qpsmtpd to 0.84.
Now the plugins are deliverd from cache.
I have modified the following plugins like this
###
#diff -u /usr/share/qpsmtpd/plugins/connection_time.orig
On Die 26.07.2011 23:02, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Dear list members,
[snipp]
I have decided to dublicate the check_badrcptto_patterns to
check_badmailfrom_pattern.
I want to share with you this solution, maybe somone have the same
problem but another solution ;-)
[snipp]
I have now seen
Dear Chris,
On Mit 27.07.2011 10:59, Chris Lewis wrote:
On 7/26/2011 10:41 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
[snipp]
Now each of our qpsmtpd instances has their own rbldnsd (serving ~700Mb
zone consisting of almost all the DNSBLs we use as one merged zone)
plus the Unbound DNS server package. This
ensures that the address contains an @, with something
to the left and right of the @.
=head1 AUTHOR
Copyright 2005 Gordon Rowell gord...@gormand.com.au
Copyright 2010 Aleksandar Lazic al-qpsm...@none.at
This software is free software and may be distributed under the same
terms as qpsmtpd itself
Dear list members,
I thought about a module which learns from the plugin dnsbl.
Maybe we call it check_known_dnsbl_spammer ;-) and use the module
http://search.cpan.org/~robm/Cache-FastMmap-1.39/lib/Cache/FastMmap.pm
Thoughts:
When the dnsbl returns a IP as Spammer
add the ip into
Dear Glen,
On Die 26.07.2011 17:17, Glen Barber wrote:
On 7/26/11 5:02 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
I have decided to dublicate the check_badrcptto_patterns to
check_badmailfrom_pattern.
I want to share with you this solution, maybe somone have the same
problem but another solution ;-)
One
Hi Mike,
On Die 17.05.2011 10:34, Mike Brack wrote:
Hi all
Can I achieve the following scenariowith qpsmtpd?
Acting as smtp proxy connecting to an external target smtp server which
is sender dependent.
The target smtp server requires smtp auth, so the proxy should pass on
the credentials to
On Mon 06.12.2010 16:34, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Do you have benchmarked it with smtpstone from postfix or some other
tools?
I just threw it on our spamtrap which does approx 50m emails/day.
Do you really mean 50 Million?
Wow that's a lot ;-)
Dear Matt,
On Fre 03.12.2010 14:33, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Thanks, I'am quite interested.
OK, the relevant files are attached. Nothing else needed changing I
don't think.
Thanks for the files.
Do you have benchmarked it with smtpstone from
On Don 02.12.2010 10:34, Pedro Melo wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Aleksandar Lazic al-qpsm...@none.at wrote:
On Die 24.11.2009 22:13, Matt Sergeant wrote:
I'll be trying to do performance testing tomorrow (comparing with
qpsmtpd-async, NOT any of the other models).
do you have
On Don 02.12.2010 09:49, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 8:42, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Hm, well I give it a try again ;-)
For what it's worth, if I was starting a qpsmtpd-like thing from
scratch today I'd almost certainly make it AnyEvent based. :-)
I like to develop something
On Don 02.12.2010 19:04, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
On Dec 2, 2010, at 10:37, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Maybe we can make another benchmark AnyEvent vs Danga::Socket due to
the fact that AnyEvent with EV as underlaying event lib looks very fast
from
On Mon 27.07.2009 22:11, Chris Lewis wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
.
push (@{$related-{$uniq_key}-{'TO'}},$1.'@'.$2);
.
.
Of course if there is a better way for the correleation I'am open for
suggestion ;-)
The thing is that unless you have only one long-running qpsmtpd
process, you can't
On Die 28.07.2009 09:34, Charlie Brady wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Chris Lewis wrote:
You'd have to push/pull the data to a centralized process. Eg:
separate daemon.
e.g. memcached.
But, isn't this a cache.
I will need another program to fetch the data, right?
Ick. Mostly ;-)
Having a
Hi Chris,
On Son 26.07.2009 13:03, Chris Lewis wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
I have solved this issus with this steps:
1.) add in plugins/connection_time in hook_pre_connection
$self-qp-connection-notes('sessionid',gettimeofday());
Your sessionids won't be unique across multiple MAIL
Dear Chris,
On Sam 25.07.2009 23:54, Chris Lewis wrote:
Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Dear List,
I use the qpsmtpd with the qpsmtpd-forkserver and syslog server logging.
[snipp]
We create a sessionid by combining an invocation of temp_file() and
config('me') (because we have multiple servers
Dear List,
I use the qpsmtpd with the qpsmtpd-forkserver and syslog server logging.
logging/syslog loglevel LOGDEBUG
I must create some reports and the tools on
http://www.hjp.at/projekte/qpsmtpd/log-tools/
are not able to analyze this log, so I have tried to create a own
analyser based on
Dear qpsmtpd-list,
I try to add the (e)?smtproutes possibility of courier and qmail to
minimize the used servers in my setup.
http://www.courier-mta.org/courier.html
http://www.qmail.org/qmail-manual-html/man8/qmail-remote.html
http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/Smtproutes
This is my first
19 matches
Mail list logo
