Re: Any chance of a new release?

2014-03-25 Thread Dan Langille
Off list, I've been pointed to https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/releases I had been looking at https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/releases Sorry for the noise. — Dan Langille d...@biglist.com On Mar 25, 2014, at 3:21 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > Hello, > > Any chance of a new r

Any chance of a new release?

2014-03-25 Thread Dan Langille
Hello, Any chance of a new release? I ask because I encountered this bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693179 which is fixed by this patch: https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/commit/1bfebd0bfd5e86f8ed4f770ba54846dc9d18e0ab which went in about a year ago. Four years

Re: questions re: async, perperl, new release

2008-06-27 Thread Matt Sergeant
e (the old "thundering herd" problem). >>> The subversion version is quite stable; indeed it's almost certainly >>> better than the last release. >> >> There's a message there ... :-) > > "quite stable" means different things to dif

Re: questions re: async, perperl, new release

2008-06-27 Thread Dale Gallagher
2008/6/27 Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> qpsmtpd-forkserver is our closest equivalent. I don't know if >> anyone's been running it under pperl or PersistentPerl for a while. > > Actually qpsmtpd-prefork is closer. Ok, great, thanks. Is qpsmtpd-async not faster? Which one would you guys rec

Re: questions re: async, perperl, new release

2008-06-27 Thread Matt Sergeant
e's been running it under pperl or PersistentPerl for a while. Actually qpsmtpd-prefork is closer. >> I noticed a mention of a new release on 4 June. Any news on that? Is >> the CVS version stable enough for production? > > The subversion version is quite stable; indeed it

Re: questions re: async, perperl, new release

2008-06-27 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
pperl, but I've never used it. qpsmtpd-forkserver is our closest equivalent. I don't know if anyone's been running it under pperl or PersistentPerl for a while. I noticed a mention of a new release on 4 June. Any news on that? Is the CVS version stable enough for producti

questions re: async, perperl, new release

2008-06-27 Thread Dale Gallagher
sed it. I noticed a mention of a new release on 4 June. Any news on that? Is the CVS version stable enough for production? Thanks Dale

new release WAS authnull plugin in config.sample/plugins enables relaying?

2007-09-25 Thread JT Moree
Matt Sergeant wrote: > Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: >> >> On Sep 23, 2007, at 9:35 PM, Sydney Bogaert wrote: >> >>> The problem I think is that this config is found in the .tar.gz file, >>> the file that most people download and install as is... >> >> Yeah, I'm thinking of rolling a 0.41 with the change

Re: New release?

2007-04-22 Thread Robin Bowes
Michael Holzt wrote: >> Is it perhaps time for another release? > > Absolutely. 0.32 is now over 1 year old and my impression is that > it is lacking lots of cool innovations done since then. I run from svn so I get all the cool innovations! :) R.

Re: New release?

2007-04-22 Thread Michael Holzt
> Is it perhaps time for another release? Absolutely. 0.32 is now over 1 year old and my impression is that it is lacking lots of cool innovations done since then. Regards Michael -- It's an insane world, but i'm proud to be a part of it. -- Bill Hicks

Re: New release?

2007-04-22 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Apr 21, 2007, at 7:12 PM, James Turnbull wrote: Is it perhaps time for another release? Yes! Or is there a TODO list outstanding? There are a few issues in the google issue tracker that we ought to fix -- but it's been so long that I suppose it's more important to get it out and m

New release?

2007-04-21 Thread James Turnbull
Hi all I've just been reviewing the last bunch of SVN changes. Is it perhaps time for another release? Or is there a TODO list outstanding? Regards James Turnbull signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature