Re: PATCH: per-role (and host and client) config hierarchy (was Re: better relay handling?)

2007-02-22 Thread Brian Grossman
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:34:35 +1100 Gavin Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:19:54PM -0700, Brian Grossman wrote: > > I anticipate a suggestion to turn it into a plugin, but the config > > hook is designed for replacing the config storage, not the naming > > scheme. Is it

Re: PATCH: per-role (and host and client) config hierarchy (was Re: better relay handling?)

2007-02-22 Thread Brian Grossman
> As a total noob and a future potential user of this, I'm curious if > there's a way to specify $ID on the command-line, in an environment > variable or something like that? Or if it would be relatively painless > to add support for this? Overwriting a config file seems a little > hackish, especi

Re: PATCH: per-role (and host and client) config hierarchy (was Re: better relay handling?)

2007-02-22 Thread Gavin Carr
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 02:19:54PM -0700, Brian Grossman wrote: > Here it is as two attachments. One attachment is a patch to > trunk/lib/Qpsmtpd.pm. The other is a file explaining how to use > the new feature. > > What do you think of it conceptually? Is there anything you'd like me to > chang

Re: PATCH: per-role (and host and client) config hierarchy (was Re: better relay handling?)

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Glines
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:19:54 -0700 Brian Grossman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:24:29 +0100 > Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is there interest? > > > > Absolutely. > > Here it is as two attachments. One attachment is a patch to > trunk/lib/Qpsmtpd.pm. T

PATCH: per-role (and host and client) config hierarchy (was Re: better relay handling?)

2007-02-22 Thread Brian Grossman
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 23:24:29 +0100 Michael Holzt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there interest? > > Absolutely. Here it is as two attachments. One attachment is a patch to trunk/lib/Qpsmtpd.pm. The other is a file explaining how to use the new feature. What do you think of it conceptually?