Re: SysV-style init.d/rc-Scripts

2006-04-05 Thread John Wang
On 4/3/06, Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure, but it's not an either/or choice. You can have SysV startup and > process supervision - that's how we do it in the SME Server. > > I imagine people also want to: > > - have processes restarted if something fails > - have a standard, cons

Re: SysV-style init.d/rc-Scripts

2006-04-03 Thread Gordon Rowell
John Wang wrote: [...] I think it would be a useful addition since I imagine most people want it to be autostarted and init.d tends to be more popular than daemontools. Sure, but it's not an either/or choice. You can have SysV startup and process supervision - that's how we do it in the SME Se

Re: SysV-style init.d/rc-Scripts

2006-04-03 Thread John Wang
On 4/3/06, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > On 2006-04-03 03:35:17 -0700, John Wang wrote: > > Would it make sense to include these (tailored to the tarball layout) > > in the tarball distribution in addition to the .rpm and .deb packages? > I think these would belong into the contrib directory we keep

Re: SysV-style init.d/rc-Scripts

2006-04-03 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2006-04-03 03:35:17 -0700, John Wang wrote: > Would it make sense to include these (tailored to the tarball layout) in the > tarball distribution in addition to the .rpm and .deb packages? Some other > tarball distributions come with init.d/rc scripts which I've found useful, &

SysV-style init.d/rc-Scripts

2006-04-03 Thread John Wang
Would it make sense to include these (tailored to the tarball layout) in the tarball distribution in addition to the .rpm and .deb packages? Some other tarball distributions come with init.d/rc scripts which I've found useful, e.g. lighttpd (RH, SuSE) and memcached (Debian). John

Re: RC scripts

2005-07-07 Thread Gordon Rowell
Matt Sergeant wrote: On 7 Jul 2005, at 18:03, Gordon Rowell wrote: We (SMEServer) have single RC script called "daemontools" and we symlink all of our daemontools/runit processes to that. All daemon specific startup is in the run scripts. Anyway, attached. Hmm, I'm thinking now that forkser

Re: RC scripts

2005-07-07 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 7 Jul 2005, at 18:03, Gordon Rowell wrote: We (SMEServer) have single RC script called "daemontools" and we symlink all of our daemontools/runit processes to that. All daemon specific startup is in the run scripts. Anyway, attached. Hmm, I'm thinking now that forkserver creates PID files,

Re: RC scripts

2005-07-07 Thread Gordon Rowell
Matt Sergeant wrote: Does anyone have an rc script for qpsmtpd that we could include in the distro? I'm sure lots of people won't want to start it via daemontools. We (SMEServer) have single RC script called "daemontools" and we symlink all of our daemontools/runit processes to that. All daemo

Re: RC scripts

2005-07-07 Thread Bryan Scott
Matt Sergeant wrote: Does anyone have an rc script for qpsmtpd that we could include in the distro? I'm sure lots of people won't want to start it via daemontools. Here's mine for RedHat using tcpserver (stripped out all the other daemontools). I don't use forkserver, so I don't know how

RC scripts

2005-07-07 Thread Matt Sergeant
Does anyone have an rc script for qpsmtpd that we could include in the distro? I'm sure lots of people won't want to start it via daemontools.