Re: RPM status

2009-07-31 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jul 30, 2009, at 16:13, Robin Bowes wrote: Thanks for working on this Robin. A couple of comments: Could the VERSION stuff not be hardcoded? It looks like qpsmtpd.spec and qpsmtpd.spec.in is the same, is that right? Would it be possible to make so making the .tar.gz will (with the

Re: RPM status

2009-07-31 Thread Robin Bowes
On 31/07/09 08:19, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Jul 30, 2009, at 16:13, Robin Bowes wrote: Thanks for working on this Robin. A couple of comments: Could the VERSION stuff not be hardcoded? It could. It's done this way so the Makefile is generic, ie. it can be used with any project

Re: RPM status

2009-07-30 Thread Filippo Carletti
The procedure to build the RPMs is as follows:        cd packaging/rpm        # edit VERSION / RELEASE as appropriate        make rpm The RPMs are put in the build directory. It doesn't work for me. I think that it's missing al least a Makefile. Here's the list of files you committed:

Re: RPM status

2009-07-30 Thread Robin Bowes
On 30/07/09 15:56, Filippo Carletti wrote: The procedure to build the RPMs is as follows: cd packaging/rpm # edit VERSION / RELEASE as appropriate make rpm The RPMs are put in the build directory. It doesn't work for me. I think that it's missing al least a

Re: RPM status

2009-07-14 Thread Robin Bowes
On 14/07/09 03:13, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Jul 13, 2009, at 14:35, Robin Bowes wrote: Well, I've done a fair bit of work on the existing spec file, and have an 0.82 RPM, which builds directly from the git repository. I'd be happy to make it all available, or even for it to be checked

Re: RPM status

2009-07-14 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jul 14, 2009, at 15:54, Robin Bowes wrote: How do you want me to get things into git? Should I send you something, or clone the repo and send a patch, or something? I'm a bit of a git neophyte, I'm afraid. Just clone the repository on github and then go crazy in your fork. When you

Re: RPM status

2009-07-13 Thread Peter J. Holzer
On 2009-07-12 09:58:08 +0100, Robin Bowes wrote: Has anyone done any work on the qpsmtpd RPM(s) recently? No, but I've planned to update the packages some time this month. The RPMs are unfortunately pretty low on my priority scale - Among the mail servers I administer, there is only one Redhat

Re: RPM status

2009-07-13 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Jul 13, 2009, at 14:35, Robin Bowes wrote: Well, I've done a fair bit of work on the existing spec file, and have an 0.82 RPM, which builds directly from the git repository. I'd be happy to make it all available, or even for it to be checked into git. I'd also be happy to take on the

RPM status

2009-07-12 Thread Robin Bowes
Hi, Has anyone done any work on the qpsmtpd RPM(s) recently? I've got 2-3 systems I'll be updating/installing over the next couple of months and I would prefer to use packages to streamline/unify the installation process. If there's been no changes recently, I'll get stuck in and update them

Re: RPM status

2009-07-12 Thread Robin Bowes
On 12/07/09 09:58, Robin Bowes wrote: Hi, Has anyone done any work on the qpsmtpd RPM(s) recently? I've got 2-3 systems I'll be updating/installing over the next couple of months and I would prefer to use packages to streamline/unify the installation process. If there's been no changes