I think the problem with naughty and blocking mostly good servers is fully
solved. The naughty plugin has been reimplemented as karma.
POD: https://www.tnpi.net/internet/mail/karma.html
Code: https://github.com/msimerson/qpsmtpd/blob/karma/plugins/karma
Here's a sample connection with the
On Fri Jun 01, 2012 at 18:40:04 -0700, Matt Simerson wrote:
But reducing code and simplifying plugins is just as important. This
implementation adds more control and flexibility to plugins without
additional code. For example, now it's possible (without writing code)
to configure all plugins
Is it a good idea to validate that the MAIL FROM address is the same as the
From: header in the message?
What exceptions need to be made, if any?
What problems might I encounter if I were to do this?
I ask because I have a client who is currently getting spammed viciously by
spammers who use
What problems might I encounter if I were to do this?
I ask because I have a client who is currently getting spammed viciously
by spammers who use one address in MAIL FROM (to pass SPF tests) and they
use the senders email address in the From: header so they can get
whitelist scoring by
On Jun 2, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Jared Johnson wrote:
Yup. Part of the motivation for this plugin was to short circuit all the
intermediate plugins and handlers so I can feed the message to sa-learn
and dspam. Until dspam is trained, that's a very important step in
training it. But there's no
Added dependency tests within the plugins, so the plugins and tests will check
for, and gracefully fail if their dependencies don't exist.
Pull request: https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/19
Changes: https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/19/files
Matt
Is there anything else I can do to move this forward?
Matt
On May 21, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Matt Simerson wrote:
https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/13
replaces 3 relay plugins (check_relay, check_norelay, relay_only) with a
single plugin (relay).
Same functionality.
Bonus:
https://github.com/smtpd/qpsmtpd/pull/20
Prior to this change, many of the plugins had some form of immunity tests. Most
of the implementations were partial (ie, they set immunity to for 1, 2, and
sometimes 3 of the standard immunity tests (relay_client, whitelisthost,
whitelistsender). This
You could ask the core developers to give you direct access to the main github
repo :-)
It seems apparent that you're invested in moving QP forward, and have the time,
talent, and motivation to do so while still playing by the rules. If I was on
the core team I think I'd be fine with letting
