Worm Blowback Storm

2005-11-03 Thread John Peacock
Man, one of my personal accounts is getting slammed by hundreds of misdirected bounces with a Subject line like: SecuryTeam Order #176857 will be processed manually by our staff I'm going to have to try and write a filter to block these puppies at the SMTP level (which is going to be

Re: Worm Blowback Storm

2005-11-03 Thread Guillaume Filion
John Peacock a écrit : I guess I should take a look at Bob Dobbs' VERP work to see about VERP-ing all of my outbound messages (so I can block non-VERP'd bounces). Remember that once you start VERPing your outgoing mail, you should wait for some time (I'd say one week) before rejecting bounces

Re: Worm Blowback Storm

2005-11-03 Thread John Peacock
Guillaume Filion wrote: Remember that once you start VERPing your outgoing mail, you should wait for some time (I'd say one week) before rejecting bounces that aren't VERPed. That way, you can receive bounces to the mails that were sent when you didn't do VERP. Yeah, I know. I would

Re: Worm Blowback Storm

2005-11-03 Thread Matt Sergeant
On 3 Nov 2005, at 11:51, John Peacock wrote: Guillaume Filion wrote: Remember that once you start VERPing your outgoing mail, you should wait for some time (I'd say one week) before rejecting bounces that aren't VERPed. That way, you can receive bounces to the mails that were sent when you

PATCH: check_badrcptto should not apply to relay clients

2005-11-03 Thread Gordon Rowell
As done in check_goodrcptto Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ diff -u check_badrcptto.orig check_badrcptto --- check_badrcptto.orig2005-11-04 11:31:43.350962930 +1100 +++ check_badrcptto 2005-11-04 11:32:19.161737046 +1100 @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ sub hook_rcpt { my ($self, $transaction,

Re: PATCH: check_badrcptto should not apply to relay clients

2005-11-03 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Nov 3, 2005, at 16:34 , Gordon Rowell wrote: As done in check_goodrcptto I'm not sure I understand the use case? - ask -- http://askask.com/ - http://develooper.com/

Re: Qpsmtpd::Address POD and tests

2005-11-03 Thread Ask Bjørn Hansen
On Nov 2, 2005, at 10:52 , John Peacock wrote: I assigned the copyright to Peter, since he started it, but I wonder if we want/need to get better about being consistent. Should we assign our own copyrights as we add stuff or should we sign over the copyright to Ask for everything? Does

Re: PATCH: check_badrcptto should not apply to relay clients

2005-11-03 Thread Gordon Rowell
Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote: On Nov 3, 2005, at 16:34 , Gordon Rowell wrote: As done in check_goodrcptto I'm not sure I understand the use case? We (SME Server) generate a badrcptto config file which blocks mail to auto-generated generic addresses like [EMAIL PROTECTED] from external use by