So if you're interested in the parsed mime functionality, your
plugin can plugin_use util/parsed-mime and the right magic happens.
Oh yeah that's right, someone *did* implement what you're talking about.
You can do it with 'plugin inheritance' (which ironically i knew nothing
about until
Jared Johnson wrote:
sub parse_mime {
That works, only this should be called parsed_mime because you're
asking for the parsed bit, not telling it to parse (every time).
Matt.
I have stuff that might wind up looking like
$rcpt-persistent-{statistics_receivedmsgs_total}++;
$rcpt-persistent-{statistics_receivedstatsbysender}{$NormalizedSenderAddress}++;
Perhaps $rcpt-storage could be provided that could be tied... it just
seems like this is the less
colleagues have also complained that notes() even exists as a method and
think it would be fine for it to just be a reserved namespace accessed
directly as a hash key.
or at least that notes() should return the {_notes} hashref if it doesn't
have any callers
-Jared
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jared Johnson jjohn...@efolder.net wrote:
Nothing's exactly stopping you from
Another thing that nothing stops us from, in a late-bound programming
language without private namespaces, is adding additional methods to
base objects without changing the code that
Another thing that nothing stops us from, in a late-bound programming
language without private namespaces, is adding additional methods to
base objects without changing the code that declares the base objects,
as long as the implementation of the base objects promises to remain
the same.
I
Would anyone object to setting the default action to 'deny' on certain
reliable low-fp URIBL lists? Probably Spamhaus SBL-XBL and DBL and URIBL
Black. It seems like a new user turning on uribl checks would expect them
to do something more than adding headers, as long as the services it
rejects
How about instead of hardcoding this, make deny be the default in the
sample config?
-R
Jared Johnson wrote:
Would anyone object to setting the default action to 'deny' on certain
reliable low-fp URIBL lists? Probably Spamhaus SBL-XBL and DBL and URIBL
Black. It seems like a new user
And by that, I mean..
I'm not sure I *object*, because there *are* blacklists we
trust... but in general, I think we try and avoid doing things that
could cause people to lose mail unintentionally. So I think I lean
slightly towards the consistent defaults of header tagging side.
-R
Robert
