Isn't back scatter exactly the intent of the spammer? Send the spam to invalid
addresses with a forged return which is where the reject goes.
But you could be right: back scatter may be so specific that these two scripts
would be the only ones ever to go into the folder.
Addresses or
On 3/12/2011 3:19 AM, Todd wrote:
Isn't back scatter exactly the intent of the spammer? Send the spam to invalid
addresses with a forged return which is where the reject goes.
The reality is that spammers use forged sender addresses so their own
accounts don't get nuked. Relying on
Some of you may be interested in this...
I decided I wanted to hack on node.js to see what all the fuss is about.
So to do that I have basically ported Qpsmtpd to Node.js (and given it a
decent name while doing so!).
It's still early days - there are no plugins to speak of yet (i.e. no
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 13:14 -0500, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Some of you may be interested in this...
I decided I wanted to hack on node.js to see what all the fuss is about.
I saw a good video introduction a while back ... got busy and forgot
about it. Some of the fuss was that it should be good
On Mar 12, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Guy Hulbert wrote:
So to do that I have basically ported Qpsmtpd to Node.js (and given it a
decent name while doing so!).
It's still early days - there are no plugins to speak of yet (i.e. no
queue plugins at all yet), but you might be interested in just
Guy Hulbert wrote:
https://github.com/baudehlo/Haraka
Had a look. I recognize bits. Do you have any feeling for how easy it
is to code versus perl
Once you get used to the idiosyncrasies of Javascript, just as easy
really. Took me a while to understand the object model, but
a perl six in javascript exists, or existed until its author found a new
distraction -- called sprixel -- that could be used to leverage CPAN into
node.js through some kind of intermediate perl-in-js layer
