Re: [Fwd: STARTTLS vulnerabilty and qmail-spamcontrol ucspi-ssl qpsmtpd]

2011-06-10 Thread Graham Todd
On 06/04/2011 12:59, Matt Sergeant wrote: No takers? I do consider the bug fairly minor (it's not like a remote root or anything)... But still? Matt, thanks for this simple and straightforward fix. Even I understand it ;-)

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: STARTTLS vulnerabilty and qmail-spamcontrol ucspi-ssl qpsmtpd]]

2011-06-07 Thread Matt Sergeant
Jared Johnson wrote: I ... disagree. From my reading of plugins/tls, it looks like there is no problem at all, in the non-async code path. It resets STDIN and STDOUT to a socket created from scratch by the IO::Socket::SSL module. I haven't looked at IO::Socket::SSL to see if it has this sort

[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: STARTTLS vulnerabilty and qmail-spamcontrol ucspi-ssl qpsmtpd]]

2011-06-05 Thread Jared Johnson
I've been otherwise occupied but I forwarded this to the rest of our dev team and our resident security guru had this to say Original Message Subject: Re: [Fwd: STARTTLS vulnerabilty and qmail-spamcontrol ucspi-ssl qpsmtpd] From:Peter

Re: [Fwd: STARTTLS vulnerabilty and qmail-spamcontrol ucspi-ssl qpsmtpd]

2011-06-04 Thread Matt Sergeant
No takers? I do consider the bug fairly minor (it's not like a remote root or anything)... But still? Matt Sergeant wrote: I'm forwarding this to the list since I didn't get a response from Ask... The problem here is when someone sends the following packet: STARTTLS\nSOME_COMMAND\n The

[Fwd: STARTTLS vulnerabilty and qmail-spamcontrol ucspi-ssl qpsmtpd]

2011-06-02 Thread Matt Sergeant
I'm forwarding this to the list since I didn't get a response from Ask... The problem here is when someone sends the following packet: STARTTLS\nSOME_COMMAND\n The SOME_COMMAND bit gets cached internally (in PollServer/async that's in $qp-{line}, but in the other implementations I have no