Yup. I should check if Haraka does the right thing with this too :)
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Jared Johnson wrote:
True, I was led astray by the comment that seemed to indicate it was all
about headers. if the intention of the comment is correct, then it should
probably if ( $in_header and ... ),
Yup there's a lot of this
going around right now. Just to be explicit though, the header lines end
in \r\r\n. Worth rejecting the bloody lot, frankly :)
Chris LewisAugust 15, 2011 4:21 PM
As a FYI, I've been seeing bot-emitted spam that appears to have
extra
\r at the end of
There's already a special case for something similar to this:
# Reject messages that have either bare LF or CR. rjkaes noticed a
# lot of spam that is malformed in the header.
($_ eq .\n or $_ eq .\r)
and $self-respond(421, See
http://smtpd.develooper.com/barelf.html;)
On 8/16/2011 11:28 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
Yup there's a lot of this going around right now. Just to be explicit
though, the header lines end in \r\r\n. Worth rejecting the bloody lot,
frankly :)
True enough, but you know well that I want a bit more out of my spam
than just to throw it away
That line of code doesn't
look at the headers though, just at the final dot at the end-of-data.
Jared JohnsonAugust 16, 2011 3:00 PM
There's already a special case for
something similar to this:# Reject messages that have either
bare LF or CR. rjkaes noticed a# lot of spam
True, I was led astray by the comment that seemed to indicate it was all
about headers. if the intention of the comment is correct, then it should
probably if ( $in_header and ... ), whether or not the new regex is added.
That block would also need to be moved to after the block that sets
Oh and FYI, this patch is well tested on our own variant of SMTP.pm, but
that variant is slightly forked, and this version is itself not
specifically tested. I'm fairly positive it'll work though :)
Hi,
We got a bug report from someone using IBM's Lotus suite (I think for both
their MUA and
On 8/15/2011 3:39 PM, Jared Johnson wrote:
Hi,
We got a bug report from someone using IBM's Lotus suite (I think for both
their MUA and MTA). Their users would often send messages where all the
content was in the subject and they didn't bother sending any message
content. I'm not sure if it's
