moin,
not even six years after the initial announcement, i have landed my
git-gpush improvements and related tools to the qtrepotools repo.
note for early adopters (i heard that there are quite some of you at
kdab): the command lines and metadata storage changed over the years.
the landing
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:03:14AM -0500, Seth Raymond wrote:
> Is there a strong reason to keep the process in its current,
> parallelized state?
>
yes. for example, a conscientious committer will want to revise the file
list when during writing the commit message they notice that the commit
is n
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:19:33PM +0200, Orgad Shaneh wrote:
>What if there are no staged files? git commit will not execute any hook on
>this case,
>
it can be forced with --allow-empty.
>and this is the typical state when the Git Commit dialog is opened.
>
well, yes, and the hook's
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:43:09AM +0100, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> Hooks do get run at this point, but it is admittedly a bit late for
> the pre-commit or the prepare-commit-msg hook. Do you have any idea
> how we can improve this -- without reimplementing all the logic built
> into git?
>
by provid
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 02:39:57PM +0300, Orgad Shaneh wrote:
>Either extend the sanity bot, or create a new bot, which listens on
>gerrit's event stream.
>If the change's owner (or an approver?) posts a comment reading "Please
>retarget ", run your script on the server side. You ne
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:32:13AM +0200, André Hartmann wrote:
> There are several pages describing how to start, best read [2] first
> and [...]
>
> [2] https://wiki.qt.io/Setting_up_Gerrit
>
the canonical landing page is
http://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Contribution_Guidelines
___
moin,
running the query
https://bugreports.qt.io/issues/?jql=status%20%3D%20%22In%20Progress%22%20AND%20updated%20%3C%20-3weeks
produces an astonishing number of tasks. i suspect in most cases the
assignee just failed to close the task after integration, while in some
cases the task was in reality
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:17:39PM +0300, Ursache Vladimir wrote:
> I know about power outages I get them rather often, and no,
> pre-existing files won't be gone (never experienced this in 15 years
> of development and I'm using QtCreator for like 6 months), you have to
> be extremely unlucky
>
ma
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:48:26AM +0300, Ursache Vladimir wrote:
> The problem here I think is that an option without fsync is not
> welcome,
>
the thing is that you totally want it until a system crash or power
outage eats your files. it's not that just the new contents are not
saved - your pre-e
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 06:05:05PM +0300, Ursache Vladimir wrote:
> I'm using Btrfs with default settings - is it contemporary enough?
>
maybe a bit _too_ contemporary - reportedly, it will still occasionally
combust spontaneously. ^^
anyway, the problem of each fsync() causing a complete fs flush
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 04:54:29AM +0300, Ursache Vladimir wrote:
> I think this varies a lot because if you have other I/O in the
> background (like me downloading a torrent at 1.6MiB/s) then doing a
> filesystem sync on each Ctrl+S in QtCreator implies a big penalty
> because apparently it means
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:56:31PM +0200, Marc Mutz wrote:
> As it is now, not even all @qt.io people know how to do this/that it's
> possible...
>
of course. why would anyone read the branch creation mails in which we
point out the possibility every single time ... it's not like they have
subject
On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:17:59PM +, J-P Nurmi wrote:
> On 05 Sep 2016, at 19:27, Marc Mutz wrote:
> > It's not about restricting what a user can do. It's simply missing
> > implementation, and I believe that if it were easy to implement,
> > Ossi would have done it long ago instead of playin
with the upcoming qtcon and my subsequent vacation, my availability will
be rather sporadic, so consider this:
- i'm not going to do reviews on a regular basis, so it's unwise to just
add me to them and expect a reaction. send me a direct mail.
- this recommendation actually applies irrespectiv
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:10:20PM +0200, Kai Köhne wrote:
> Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:15:44PM +0200, Kai Köhne wrote:
> > > "Make sure that your commit matches the Qt Commit Policy.
> > >
> > > > 1. Invite relevant revie
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:15:44PM +0200, Kai Köhne wrote:
> The page is obviously written from the viewpoint of a maintainer. I'd
> prefer to write It in a less intimidating way to the contributor, and
> make it helpful for first time, inexperienced contributors.
>
first-timers can ask in case of
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:57:28AM +0200, Martin Smith wrote:
> Sometimes I am listed as a reviewer for a code change in Qt that also involves
> documentation changes. The code change is sometimes outside my expertise, but
> I
> assume I have been included to approve the documentation changes. I a
just a heads-up that i (finally) split off the review policy from the
commit policy. see https://wiki.qt.io/Review_Policy .
if you have suggestions for improvement, please discuss them upfront on
irc.
you're expected to read the document even if you're not interested in
actively improving it any t
somewhen in the last days, gerrit started to silently fail to send most
notification mails. the problem was "fixed" with a restart, but the
already missed notifications are lost.
so it is a good idea to check your dashboard for recent activity if
you're usually relying on a notification-based workf
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:07:40PM -0400, Remik Ziemlinski wrote:
> I just released a plugin to SaveAll at a custom interval.
> This can help you avoid losing code during a crash and removes the distraction
> of saving.
>
eh, why? creator has had autosaving (to .autosave files) for quite a
while a
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:24:17PM +1000, Alexander Drozdov wrote:
> I tried to login to the CodeReview via new signle token... But login
> process fails with error and creates new account that can't be assigned
> with all my mails :(
>
> My old user name on CodeReview is a monah_tuk, mails: adroz
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 12:48:58PM +0100, Andrzej Telszewski wrote:
> When I generate Makefile with qmake, the recipe for installing looks something
> like this:
>
> install_target: first FORCE
> @$(CHK_DIR_EXISTS) $(INSTALL_ROOT)/usr/sbin/ || $(MKDIR)
> $(INSTALL_ROOT)/usr/sbin/
> -$(
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:27:06AM +, Jokiniva Jukka wrote:
> Use your unified Qt Account credentials to login from now on.
>
fwiw, i'm anticipating that everyone who still used two different
accounts for jira (proper) and gerrit will have problems now (though
maybe not quite as tough as thiag
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 06:13:25AM +0200, Davide Picchi wrote:
> $ ./configure -v -opensource -confirm-license -prefix /opt/qt -platform
> mkspecs/linux-g++-64 -xplatform mkspecs/linux-am335-g++ -no-sse2 -no-glib
> -no-cups -no-largefile -no-accessibility -no-openssl -no-gtkstyle
> -little-endian -
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 05:40:36PM +0200, Jochen Becher wrote:
> (1) A static library that implements the "modelling backend" (entities,
> persistence, diagrams, UI components)
>
> (2) A plugin that links the modelling backend with QtCreator (mostly a
> new editor for diagrams)
>
> (3) A tool to
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 10:15:40AM +0300, Orgad Shaneh wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:58 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > The issue here is, that I know the current code will be rejected
> > straight away due to Qt(Creator)-incompatible coding conventions
> > used. So, we need to port to Qt codi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 08:32:51AM +, Ziller Eike wrote:
> On Apr 13, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> > The /Branches article says
> > "Qt Creator uses the same branching policy as Qt itself”
>
> That information was never correct then.
>
i don't see how that is true in any way. yo
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:07:56PM +0100, Henry Skoglund wrote:
> About switching building QtC to MSVC2013, that's excellent news, thank you!
>
> I'm testing it now, looks good. Just want to add, I'm testing it in a
> Windows XP Virtual Machine on VMWare Fusion. So it still works fine
> under Wi
moin,
as some of you noticed, we had two issues with jira:
- on january 19, we had a database problem which resulted in
"weird-looking" tasks and whatever else. some people responded to that
by filing many duplicates of the same task. i recovered the
"best-looking" instance of each task and
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 05:24:50PM +0100, Petr Vaněk wrote:
> copy2build.output = $$IDE_DATA_PATH/${QMAKE_FUNC_FILE_IN_stripSrcDir}
> [...]
> The subdir does not exist in the target so cp fails with "No such file
> or directory" error.
>
> But I really cannot find the place where is the "share" d
On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 04:35:05PM -0200, Rafael Roquetto wrote:
> This question regards mainly the QNX plugin for QtC.
>
it equally affects embedded linux. i think even android.
> Nonetheless, many of our costumers are using Windows as their development
> host, which means that, since Windows do
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 08:37:46AM +, Miettinen Riitta-Leena wrote:
> Also, check whether you need to take new screen shots, as described here:
>
well, no, don't. if everybody actually started to update the
screenshots after every stupid gui change, it would soon take an hour to
clone creator
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:32:11AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> this stuff is not tested under windows, but there shouldn't be any major
> problems.
>
famous last words ...
after sacrificing a dozen kittens i got it working - out of the box with
msysgit (obviously, you sti
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:57:49PM +0300, Orgad Shaneh wrote:
> An alternative to constant rebasing of the current branch is using *a
> separate clone* for pushing. This clone can share objects with the real
> working clone (via .git/objects/info/alternates), then you can easily git
> checkout and
we are in the middle of the bugfixing week, so everyone is wrangling
half a dozen mostly unrelated changes at the same time. the perfect
time to plug the awesomely improved gpush!
from the manual:
Prior to actually pushing any commits, gpush will temporarily rebase
them onto a new base. T
... then use chrome/chromium.
because the slowness is coming from gerrit running massive amounts of js
in your browser, and chrome is literally an order of magnitude faster at
it than firefox (no clue about ie).
if you already use it, well, tough luck. get a cryo-cooled cpu, or
something.
if you ha
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 04:05:41PM +0100, Yves Bailly wrote:
> The subdirs are all executable projects (no libraries) which
> have no build-time dependencies between them.
vs.
> CONFIG += ordered
do you even know what that means?
> When I request to run one of the subproject, *all* the subproj
port
parallelization or does not like ccache or icecream, then you may need
to adjust the flags to disable it.
/*
Copyright (C) 2002 Oswald Buddenhagen
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1.
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 12:01:19AM +, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> During such process of following/copying, how copyrights should be managed?
>
what you are calling "copyrights" (i.e., the copyright headers) are
legally largely irrelevant. it's merely a claim of copyright. the actual
copyright der
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 06:24:46PM -0800, VStevenP wrote:
> I see the following General Messages in Qt Creator 3.0.0 Beta w/ Qt 5.2 Beta
> (Mac/Android) when I open my .pro:
> [...]
>
> Interestingly enough, none of these messages affect my ability to build with
> the armv7 kit and run my projec
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:01:00AM +, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> I wonder what's the rationale behind single "Open File or Project" command.
> Why not to have two separate commands in the File menu?
>
> If I have my.pro project loaded, I can't use CTRL+O dialog to open
> my.pro file for editing,
On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 01:22:51PM -0400, Duane wrote:
> I commented out the include for the cpp file and ran qmake. Then I see
> the make file has a line to build spoo.o.
>
> After this I can remove my comments and build, rebuild clean whatever
> and it works. If I run qmake again it breaks.
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 08:52:47PM +0200, Elias Steurer wrote:
> But stop to evolve is not a good thing. You get my point, right?
>
actually, no. "because we can" is not a good enough reason for change. i
know that artists tend to disagree on that point. i couldn't care less.
convince us with subs
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:43:15PM +0200, Sven Goericke wrote:
> On 08/13/2013 12:19 PM, Daniel Teske wrote:
> > In the private mail you send, you mentioned parsing makefiles for their
> > target.
> > That would not fit into what the generic project manager is.
> >
> I understand that. So my que
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:50:06PM +0200, Ziller Eike wrote:
> On 09.07.2013, at 13:35, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:51:51PM +0200, Ziller Eike wrote:
> >> I don't see the point, Qt doesn't use namespaces at all. So going the Qt
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:51:51PM +0200, Ziller Eike wrote:
>
> On 09.07.2013, at 11:11, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:01:56PM +0200, André Pönitz wrote:
> >> (b) Lower case outermost namespace
> >> Contra:
> >>
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:01:56PM +0200, André Pönitz wrote:
> (b) Lower case outermost namespace
> Contra:
> - It works as it is.
>
- it's non-qt
to solve the clash problem, there are two approaches:
- use an additional convention (ugly)
- FooNames::Foo
- Foo::FooClass
- remove the redund
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 12:53:21PM +, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Actually I always wanted to check out how far we could get with
> building Qt Creator packages with obs (http://openbuildservice.org/,
> http://build.opensuse.org/). In theory this should allow us to build
> rpm/debian packages for vari
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:17:39PM +0100, El Mehdi Fekari wrote:
> I would like to ask if it's possible to get one more patch in the QNX
> plugin that brings minor UI changes on 2.7:
> [...]
> The patch was submitted quite some time before the string freeze, but it
> took time to review it
>
you
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:08:05PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote:
> go and translate 2.6, then update the file for 2.7 (how?), or directly go
> and translate 2.7, even though the freeze did not happen yet? The goal is
> to avoid possible loss of work while updating the translation, and
> minimizing
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:11:36PM +, Massimo Callegari wrote:
> I've checked the KDE translations page
>
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/it/messages/qt/
by http://l10n.kde.org/team-infos.php?teamcode=it (you *must* get the
entire team's agreement to re-use any of their work - otherwise u
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 02:16:24AM +0100, Massimo Callegari wrote:
> Does it mean I have necessarily to translate Qt in italian first ??
>
yes
> Kinda not making sense.
>
well, it does. creator does display some messages from qt, and we don't
want a language mix.
> Also because 4.8.x users wouldn
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 12:57:33PM +, Koehne Kai wrote:
> We'll branch 2.7 today in about two hours. That is, if you've still
> patches for master open in gerrit that should go into 2.7.0 you should
> abandon these, and re-push then to the 2.7 branch.
>
branch was created.
remember to abandon
as some are clearly not on the qt dev list ...
- Forwarded message from Oswald Buddenhagen
-
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:02:56 +0100
From: Oswald Buddenhagen
To: developm...@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] FYI: non-approvers may now stage/submit
moin,
it occurred to me that the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 05:41:16PM +0100, "Dr. Thorsten Lück" wrote:
> Does anybody has an idea how to cope with this?
>
CONFIG += no_batch
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:59:51AM +0100, guillaume.b...@free.fr wrote:
> I juste began to update french translation of Qt Creator
> (http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/localization/2012-December/06.html).
> Is that still ok for 2.6.1 ?
>
if you are really quick (like, get it done today),
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 08:50:49AM +, ext eike.zil...@nokia.com wrote:
> Opinions, comments, ideas?
>
see https://codereview.qt-project.org/33577 including comments.
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/ma
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 03:07:36PM +, ext tobias.hun...@nokia.com wrote:
> Hi Ruslan!
>
> Welcome aboard!
>
> I did not have private communication with Yuchen on this topic, so just check
> the archives:-) Basically it is a normal branch now, so you can use the
> normal gerrit workflow.
>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:22:12PM +0600, ext Ruslan Nigmatullin wrote:
> As Loaden has moved from QBS project I suppose that I can handle QBS plugin
> for QtCreator. Can you duplicate the description of process to me?
>
there is no process, really.
loaden should un-abandon his changes, so you
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:01:45PM +0800, ext Loaden wrote:
> loaden@qpsoft:~/qpSOFT/Projects/QtCreator$ git push gerrit
> To ssh://loa...@codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt-creator/qt-creator
> ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/wip/qbs (prohibited by Gerrit)
> error: failed to push some refs t
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 02:36:54PM +0200, ext Daniel Teske wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 Jul 2012 03:44:22 ext Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> > Should moc look for .json files in $$OUT_PWD or should creator force the
> > .json files to be created in the correct directory.
> Good question. From a Creator standp
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:10:40AM +1000, ext Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> Are there any hints on how to setup a Qt 5 install that Creator will
> use happily?
>
you take creator master from today and compile it yourself ...
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-crea
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 10:32:17AM +0800, ext Loaden wrote:
> Any news / plans ?
>
the colleague working on it is on extended sick leave, so work is stalled.
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listin
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 06:13:04PM +0200, ext Vojtěch Král wrote:
> Diego wrote:
> > My key point is: don't talk. Do.
> > This guy even with all the problems he is causing you he is kicking
> > ass more then you. If you think you can do better - do.
>
> Okay, I can do stuff, I don't really know _w
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 01:00:21PM +0400, ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> void foo()
> {
> #ifdef foo
> doSomething();
> #ifdef bar
> bar();
> #else
> notBar();
> #endif
> #endif
> }
>
void foo()
{
#ifdef foo
doSomething();
# ifdef bar
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:37:30PM +0400, ext Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>
> 07.05.2012, 12:30, "Oswald Buddenhagen" :
> > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:31:17PM +0300, ext Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> >
> >> The C standard says: [...]
> >>
>
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:37:59PM -0700, ext Mohammad Mirzadeh wrote:
> I have a package that comes with makefiles and conf files defining several
> variables. How can I import these variables inside a .pro file and tell
> qmake to use them? I tried include() but did not seem to work
>
well, you
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 06:31:17PM +0300, ext Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> The C standard says: [...]
>
> Indenting preprocessor directives is perfectly acceptable by the standard.
>
while this is correct, it's still just stupid to indent preprocessor
directives with the rest of the code. it is a *
68 matches
Mail list logo
