One thing I would like is a fix-it for a implicit conversion.
I'm old school and like the short, easy, old casts:
(type) x; (gives "use of old-style cast" message)
but the new style:
static_cast (val)
is much harder to type. It's got _ and <> and I've got to edit behind the
variable, which
>
> From: Vadim Peretokin
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:42 PM
> To: Ivan Donchevskii
> Cc: Michael Jackson; qt-creator@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
>
> That's a great addition! C
" wrote:
>
> Yes, there are checkboxes for fix-its so you can apply selected ones.
>
>
> From: Vadim Peretokin
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:42 PM
> To: Ivan Donchevskii
> Cc: Michael Jackson; qt-creator@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] What are y
d documents. I
hope it solves your problem at least partially :)
From: Qt-creator on
behalf of Michael Jackson
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:03:37 PM
To: qt-creator@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
I tend to go back and forth between tu
ted ones.
>
> --
> *From:* Vadim Peretokin
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:42 PM
> *To:* Ivan Donchevskii
> *Cc:* Michael Jackson; qt-creator@qt-project.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
> That's
ect.org<mailto:qt-creator@qt-project.org>
Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
I tend to go back and forth between turning it off so that code completion
actually completes in a reasonable amount of time (~1 second) or having all the
helpful insights into my code base.
ves your problem at least partially :)
> --
> *From:* Qt-creator qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Michael Jackson <
> mike.jack...@bluequartz.net>
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:03:37 PM
> *To:* qt-creator@qt-project.org
>
> *Subjec
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 6:03:37 PM
To: qt-creator@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
I tend to go back and forth between turning it off so that code completion
actually completes in a reasonable amount of time (~1 second) or having all the
he
I tend to go back and forth between turning it off so that code completion
actually completes in a reasonable amount of time (~1 second) or having all the
helpful insights into my code base. It is almost like QtCreator needs to have 2
threads running. One for the code completion and one for the
am using the loop increment variable
> for aother things, that is a not good to recommend. It doesn't seem to
> detect that.
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 4:39 AM
> *From:* "Ivan Donchevskii"
> *To:* "qt-creator@qt-project.org"
> *Subject:*
"qt-creator@qt-project.org"
Subject: Re: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
You can also check the full list of Clang-Tidy 6.0 checks at https://releases.llvm.org/6.0.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/
From: Qt-creator on behalf of Ivan Don
Subject: [Qt-creator] What are your favorite clang-tidy checks
Hi!
On the contributors summit I mentioned that we want to introduce the "default"
set of flags for Clang-Tidy which can be used as a starting point for analysis
and is good enough for some random project developed in
Hi!
On the contributors summit I mentioned that we want to introduce the "default"
set of flags for Clang-Tidy which can be used as a starting point for analysis
and is good enough for some random project developed in Qt Creator.
We have an example of it in https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/
13 matches
Mail list logo
