Since this seems to be only place reliable get some attetion:
Any opposition of me rewriting the website not using wordpress?
--
Terveisin,
Samu Voutilainen
http://smar.fi
___
Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
Qt-jambi-interest@qt.nokia.com
http://lists.q
For me, it doesn't matter which system the website uses.
What's the problem with the current one?
--
René
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: qt-jambi-interest-bounces+lists=sibvisions@qt.nokia.com
> [mailto:qt-jambi-interest-bounces+lists=sibvisions@qt.nokia.com] Im
> Auftrag vo
I’m totally fed up with Wordpress. I don’t want to touch to it, and no-one else
does *any* upkeep, so it shouldn’t matter in any scale...
The current layout is good, but there’s some things I’d like to get fixed, and
that requires either editing the source of the plugin or ripping of the layout
OK, I don't think anyone has a problem with a new system.
But the result should be open enough that it is possible to change content,
even
if you are not available.
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: qt-jambi-interest-bounces+lists=sibvisions@qt.nokia.com
> [mailto:qt-jambi-inter
Sure, anyone who needs can get access to the server. For other data there’s for
example wiki at qt devnet.
On Sunday 06 March 2011 17:03:32 René Jahn wrote:
> OK, I don't think anyone has a problem with a new system.
>
> But the result should be open enough that it is possible to change content,
I know it J
as developer
JVx has a UI implementation for Qt Jambi. This includes custom layouts, some
extended/changed components and the Model implementation.
Web UI is based on extGWT
Android AddOns are not based on QT Standard Android APIs with Adapters for
Model binding
... it
