Hi, Thanks to you, for using Jambi :)
Qt Jambi releases to 4.7 are not still stable, so there is some known bugs already fixed in trunk. 4.6 releases were not exactly state-of-the-art, but they provided good start for community to get going and start developing suitable releases systems and new features. This year we have bee nworking on getting used to Jambi, studying it, fixing strange bugs and otherwise try to improve it to fit better into both Qt and Java worlds. The devs are not working full time for Jambi so development happens slower than we’d actually like. (read: help is always needed and wanted!) With this new release system we’ll have automated build system that will make builds for each supported architecture using same snapshot, and which can be then tested and eventually released as stable when we have something bugfree. I have been working towards new website (sorry, it has been too long since I have blogged or done anything useful, but I’ve been really busy with life-related matters), which I’m hoping to get out this month. Major blocker for it is at the moment support for documentation, which needs, by nature of it being generated, some parsing to get it working properly. For this regards, there has been some work for getting up to date Javadoc for Jambi, and this time with better architecture, so that the doc will be easily visible in IDE without needing to separately add it to it. I’m sorry that I can’t give any deadlines when stuff will be ready since we are only volunteering for this project and hence I can’t go whining (I guess I do it anyway...) to people to do stuff faster. I’d be first one that should be shouted at, others have been doing really really much for the project. I’d say Jambi’s success depends on how stable we can get it. So we can’t just release bunch of updated code without actually verifying it works. After all, most of Jambi’s users are companies, along with some open source projects that could in future use ”beta” packages (or weekly builds) that will be updated more often. And of course with new website, to have one place that collects resources related Jambi together so the user can freely just do the programming with handy documentation and resources instead of spending hours searching through the web. If I missed any questions, please say so and I’ll try to answer to them too :) On Sunday 09 October 2011 13:19:37 Ahmet Erdinc YILMAZ wrote: > Hi, > Thank you very much for your efforts QtJambi. I am using it for > almost 3 years and really love to program with it. In my company, I use > it heavily and want to convince my colleagues to use it. However I have > some doubts. After I read some posts like "Qt-Jambi officially > dead","Untested many features".... > I got very sad. Also I had some problems in 4.7 builds, (missing > plug-ins) in the build. My question is that, > am I doing wrong thing to suggest it? Is there going to be stable builds > for 4.7.x versions? > I am currently working as an engineer, and a M.S. degree student in > Middle East Technical University. Therefore I do not have time to > contribute the project. but I really want it to go on successfully. > However I promise to contribute in programming when I finish my M.S. > degree :-). > What are your ideas? What is the current status of the project? Can > it be as successful as PyQt in python? When there will be stable builds > for latest Qt versions? > > Again, I am very grateful for your efforts to QtJambi project. > -erdinc > _______________________________________________ > Qt-jambi-interest mailing list > Qt-jambi-interest@qt.nokia.com > http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest -- Terveisin Samu Voutilainen SLM Finland Oy _______________________________________________ Qt-jambi-interest mailing list Qt-jambi-interest@qt.nokia.com http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest
