back on topic - 610 RAM

On my 610, will 2x16 be enough RAM, or should I go ahead and invest in 2x32 RAM sticks. The machine is mostly going to be used for surfing by 56k modem and some word processing functions. If the extra RAM will make it able to do image manipulations, even slowly compared to today's standards,

Re: back on topic

Michael Dawe wrote: >on 19/12/2002, Sque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Nick at AppleBits has a good stash of stuff: >__ > > Excellent, its the ones under your nose you

Re: DiskCopy

At 09:14 -0500 on 19/12/02, Charles Estabrooks wrote: >I'll probably post this to the powermacs list as well, but... > >When trying to make floppy disks from disk images, I am only able to make >them successfuly on my 68K machines (using DiskCopy 4.2), including my >Quadra 650. When I try on my P

Re: Q950 upgrade was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

At 07:49 -0100 on 19/12/02, Ian Moffatt wrote: >**Quadlist content warning** LOL! >Anyone upgraded a Q950 by putting a PPC motherboard in? I think the NuBus >option may be easier though. Only mobo that fits is that from the Workgroup Server 9150, and they're not only rare, but also very valuabl

Re: Excuse me?

At 08:12 -0600 on 19/12/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Might I suggest that everyone start updating emailing filters so this >>> flame-fest can fade away already? >>> >> >> I get Keith Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] of Illinois as a match, you might >> check for yourself and add to filters as you see

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

At 11:33 AM 12/19/2002, Jim Lunceford typed thusly: >Please correct for grammer, content and netiquette and reply to: Unfortunately, my grammer died several years ago, about the time of the last quadras, and therefore never had to worry about netiquette -Eric -- Quadlist is sponsored by

Re: Nanny interference etc.

Thanks R.A. Jim - "R.A. Cantrell" wrote: > on 12/19/02 3:56 PM, vincenzo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> Please correct for grammer, content and netiquette and reply to: > > I don't do this as my own grammer spelling etc is not that great. > grammar, superfluous >

Re: Nanny interference etc.

on 12/19/02 3:56 PM, vincenzo at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Please correct for grammer, content and netiquette and reply to: > I don't do this as my own grammer spelling etc is not that great. grammar, superfluous Always glad to help. -- All the best, R.A. Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Qu

Nanny interference etc.

Jim >Due to the fact that nothing on this list seems to be O.T. at this >point, I thought I'd just ignore the the policy of writing directly >to you and just send it to list. As most who subscribe to the list are adults, I try not to interfere too much with the day to day running of the List. In

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

List Nanny: Due to the fact that nothing on this list seems to be O.T. at this point, I thought I'd just ignore the the policy of writing directly to you and just send it to list. I have a suggestion.I think we should start a new list. We could call it "The NO MORE WARNING, NETIQUETTE and GRAMMER

Top Post Time Again?

>Think we can all do without the grammer lesson. >Top posted for your reading convience. > Top post time again? I thought that topic had been finalized by the list nanny already. I guess not. Convenience should not take over the the set upon agreements of protocol because one person thinks so.

Re: Excuse me?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>I get Keith Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] of Illinois as a match, you might >>check for yourself and add to filters as you see fit and I do suggest >>not taking my word for it. >> >> > >I don't know what that meant, but I assure you, I had no part in any of the >temper

Re: -sigh- was:[Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages]

At 7:51 -0600, 12/19/02, (Danny Saul) observed: I wish to thank all you who supported me, I was half awake when I posted that and I could of phrased it better, but the pickle and the other went out of bounds to probe my e-mail for the slightest errors in spelling and grammar after I had b

Re: ATTO SE II vs. ATTO SE IV

I guess it might depend on what version of the Avid software you are running, as the software expects to see certain things before it'll load. With Media Composer v5 on the Q950 the IV was used (that's what I've got), and depending on what resolutions you are using (ie up to AVR3) you could u

DiskCopy

I'll probably post this to the powermacs list as well, but... When trying to make floppy disks from disk images, I am only able to make them successfuly on my 68K machines (using DiskCopy 4.2), including my Quadra 650. When I try on my PowerMacs, DiskCopy (v 6.3.3) fails about 90% of the time. A

Excuse me?

>> Might I suggest that everyone start updating emailing filters so this >> flame-fest can fade away already? >> > > I get Keith Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] of Illinois as a match, you might > check for yourself and add to filters as you see fit and I do suggest > not taking my word for it. I don'

Re: back on topic

on 19/12/2002, Sque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone in Oz got a spare Q800 (there abouts) case I can drop this Q800 > board into, I've found it very hard to bring myself to swapping the 700 > board out of its ugly box, this particular box must have spent life in > direct sunlight in a mechanic

-sigh- was:[Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages]

I wish to thank all you who supported me, I was half awake when I posted that and I could of phrased it better, but the pickle and the other went out of bounds to probe my e-mail for the slightest errors in spelling and grammar after I had been awake you 20 minutes. Nice going I applaud you in your

Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

On 12/18/02 8:47 AM, "the pickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 22:08 -0700 on 17/12/02, J Sand wrote: > >> None were meant to be an attack. I get just as frustrated as you do about > > I'm a blunt person, so I'll put this bluntly. While John's might not have > been, mine certainly was. If

Re: Grammar [ was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages ]

Think we can all do without the grammer lesson. Top posted for your reading convience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >But "me and whoever" is quite correct, if used in the accusative. > >e.g. My father sent me and whoever away to school. > > > > > >>I guess my English teachers back in school did

Grammar [ was Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages ]

But "me and whoever" is quite correct, if used in the accusative. e.g. My father sent me and whoever away to school. > > I guess my English teachers back in school did their job well. It is ironic > because my children say "me and whoever" instead of "whoever and I". I > cringe at that,

Re: Apple & Mac computers?

At 4:57 PM -0700 12/18/02, Terry Ovans wrote: >Can anyone tell me where to find some information on older Apple and >Macintosh computers. I have 8 of them and would like to know what >makes them tick, how to fix them, & other technical stuff like that. > Terry, Make your first stop the excellent

Re: Trying to drag back on topic

E McCann wrote: >Um... looks like someone tried to take this offlist... and it got dragged >back on. > Um... thats a no-no :) Such a shame to throw a tantrum like that, ya feel like a tosser later on. >Might I suggest that everyone start updating emailing filters so this >flame-fest can fad

Re: Apple & Mac computers

Terry Ovans wrote: >Can anyone tell me where to find some information on older Apple and >Macintosh computers. I have 8 of them and would like to know what >makes them tick, how to fix them, & other technical stuff like that. > > You might try the FAQ, http://macfaq.org/ Gamba's http://ho

Trying to drag back on topic Re: NO MORE "WARNING!" Messages

Um... looks like someone tried to take this offlist... and it got dragged back on. Might I suggest that everyone start updating emailing filters so this flame-fest can fade away already? In the meantime... down to two Q840AVs and the trusty 800. No idea why the third has flaked out... it's cur