Negatory!
DOS and Windows run better, and more reliably, on a MAC, than on a
gen-u-wine
PC.
Seriously!
That changes my opinion of the DOS card from being a novelty. I assume it
has something to do with how the instruction set is being used in the 680X0
style of CPU chip being more stable
Well, my 640CD DOS runs Win95 fine, and would likely run 98. Haven't tried
NT.
Using PCSetup, Win98 is supposed to be supported. NT never will be.
This is probably due to the fact that both Win 95/98 both use a different
style of FAT (File Allocation Table) than NT which uses NTFS. NT is
on 1/22/03 6:37 AM, J Sand at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, my 640CD DOS runs Win95 fine, and would likely run 98. Haven't tried
NT.
Using PCSetup, Win98 is supposed to be supported. NT never will be.
This is probably due to the fact that both Win 95/98 both use a different
style
Actually, it is the way NT allows access to the system peripherals. NT
is supposed to simulate what called protective mode operations. If
an app fails, theoretically, the OS won't crash (but it still does).
In running this way, NT drivers were VERY specific and kludgy. That's
why very few
