It's been a couple years, but I remember downloading and playing
with something that purported to be a 68k multiprocessing setup. It
had a strange name like Hen and Chicks or some such... I'll have to
go dig up my Powerbook I was playing with it on and see if it's
still on there. The main
with the older versions of the mac os, i doubt it. with linux or bsd etc. possibly.
in
any case, it's not worth worrying about, it would still be way, way too slow for seti
and
like that. i like the q700, but it's just not up to major, major number crunching like
what's needed for seti and
Dwight Hines wrote:
I have two quad 700s and would like to yoke them together for seti and other
types of intensive cranking.
Anyone doing that?
d
It's been a couple years, but I remember downloading and playing with
something that purported to be a 68k multiprocessing setup. It had a
strange
on 22/08/2004 2:10 AM, Philip Stortz at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
i do love them since they have the small iici form factor. also, for less
critical use i'll be offering a clock chipping circuitsoon that's better
than the older approach and won't require soldering. i'll also be checking
with
Its called Project Appleseed.
On Aug 21, 2004, at 12:41 PM, Scott Holder wrote:
Dwight Hines wrote:
I have two quad 700s and would like to yoke them together for seti
and other
types of intensive cranking.
Anyone doing that?
d
It's been a couple years, but I remember downloading and playing with
I have two quad 700s and would like to yoke them together for seti and other
types of intensive cranking.
Anyone doing that?
d
--
Quadlist is sponsored by http://lowendmac.com/ and...
Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.smalldog.com | Enter To Win A |
-- Canon PowerShot Digital Cameras
