As they're rather simple & uncontended, I've applied 2,3,5,6,7:
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 01:40:54PM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
> Timo Teräs (10):
> privs: fix privilege dropping to use system defined groups
> lib: allow caller to provide prefix storage in sockunion2hostprefix
> sockunion: add a
Currently extract.pl.in is used to build the vtysh cli. When two
different cli's collide with the same command name, the original
cli is never called, because it is dropped. This code notes the
silent drop and tracks the number of drops. If they change then
the code will fail the build.
If you
In a small experiment that I'm running now Quagga (zebra,
ospfd, pimd) uses 9MB of RAM. if I start adding VRFs I'm going to hit
a wall really quick.
Right, memory will be an issue. Even worst, we have seen that time to
start many daemons does not scale:
https://lists.quagga.net/pipermail/qu
On 2015-05-28 17:45, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:36:30PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
>> Are we on the same page with that? Or is there disagreement there?
> As someone working on small embedded level boxes without lots of cpu
> cores, the separate process per VRF is not desira
On 5/28/2015 11:35 AM, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
As someone working on small embedded level boxes without lots of cpu
cores, the separate process per VRF is not desirable at all. One
process with one config interface running in multiple namespaces is
ide
Lennart, I agree. I Kinda made the same statements in earlier emails.
I also don't have a strong opinion against moving VRF
creation/management to a new daemon.
Unlike other protocol daemons that need to be replicated across
different VRFs creating a scalability concern on
some platforms, a V
On 5/28/2015 11:29 AM, Jafar Al-Gharaibeh wrote:
Lennart, I agree. I Kinda made the same statements in earlier emails.
I also don't have a strong opinion against moving VRF
creation/management to a new daemon.
Unlike other protocol daemons that need to be replicated across
different VRFs crea
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
As someone working on small embedded level boxes without lots of cpu
cores, the separate process per VRF is not desirable at all. One
process with one config interface running in multiple namespaces is
ideal for us (and in fact what we are currentl
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:36:30PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> I still have some stuff I need addressed, to be "sold" on.
>
> First off, we need to discus the end-destination. As it may be very
> difficult, if not impossible, to agree on the next step if we're not
> agreed on the d
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Timo Teras wrote:
As alternative, I would then move encoding/decoding of all the
complicated structures to where is defined. That is stream_put_prefix()
should go in prefix.h (perhaps renamed to prefix_something). The problem
is that it's not practical to assume that strea
ack
--
Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
"One's never alone with a rubber duck. "
___
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
Ack
--
Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
What makes the universe so hard to comprehend is that there's nothing
to compare it with.
___
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:53:38 +0100 (BST)
Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Fri, 22 May 2015, Donald Sharp wrote:
>
> > I would buy the faster build time if the header wasn't actually
> > needed. To take the argument to it's logical conclusion just
> > define everything you need right in the c code instead
Ack.
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Timo Teräs wrote:
Merge the conditionals as one to avoid code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs
regards,
--
Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
About the only thing we have left that actually discriminates in favor of
the plain pe
On Thu, 28 May 2015, Paul Jakma wrote:
daemons, for a use-case that does need the client-daemons to be modified?
s/does need/does not need/
regards,
--
Paul Jakma p...@jakma.org @pjakma Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Don't hit the keys so hard, it hurts.
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Donald Sharp wrote:
I would buy the faster build time if the header wasn't actually needed. To
take the argument to it's logical conclusion just define everything you
need right in the c code instead of using headers if we are after faster
compile time.
If there are namesp
On Fri, 22 May 2015, Timo Teräs wrote:
It may be requred for quagga process to belong to additional
groups. E.g. nhrp module will need to talk to strongSwan using
vici and may require additional permissions. Initialize groups
from the system group database.
Signed-off-by: Timo Teräs
Ack.
re
Hi Vincent,
I still have some stuff I need addressed, to be "sold" on.
First off, we need to discus the end-destination. As it may be very
difficult, if not impossible, to agree on the next step if we're not
agreed on the destination.
There seemed to wide agreement that in a perfect world we
18 matches
Mail list logo
