STP has detected a loop in discussion :) On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:03:32PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > If the driving concern is the risk of routing loops for users, then we > should avoid exposing ones not exposed currently with any change, as > much as possible.
I still believe the set size of Quagga monoculture users impacted by moving to RFC behaviour is sufficiently close to zero, while at the other hand the to-be-fixed current impact on mixed-implementation installations is at least existent; which brings me back around to => On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:03:32PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2016, David Lamparter wrote: > > The event most likely to change my opinion on this is being presented > > with an actual real-world setup that sees breakage from this. From > > the way this bug works, I guess it'd need to be a Quagga-only > > production network. -David _______________________________________________ Quagga-dev mailing list Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
