-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2017-06-04 16:45, Axel wrote:
> Excellent, and it's even free of charge. Following links from
> opentimestamps.org, I found https://stamp.io/ which claims to also
> be free of charge, and using both Bitcoin and Ethereum
> blockchains.
>
Looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2017-06-04 07:29, Axel wrote:
> I did not see that pull request. Note however that the pull request
> makes qubes-secpack depend on the blockchain in order to prove
> information creation *after* a certain point in time, while my
> suggestion was
Excellent, and it's even free of charge. Following links from
opentimestamps.org, I found https://stamp.io/ which claims to also be free
of charge, and using both Bitcoin and Ethereum blockchains.
On Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 7:04:55 PM UTC+2, Jean-Philippe Ouellet wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 a
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Vít Šesták
wrote:
> There are defined keyboard scancodes for copy&paste:
>
> 0x7BKeyboard Cut
> 0x7CKeyboard Copy
> 0x7DKeyboard Paste
>
> Source: http://www.freebsddiary.org/APC/usb_hid_usages.php
> i am not sure how much they ar
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Axel wrote:
> As Joanna has already noted, qubes-secpack is not advertised as solving all
> problems related to distribution security, but "the best we can do"
> currently.
>
> I'd like to suggest a practical improvement of qubes-secpack that I believe
> can protec
I did not see that pull request. Note however that the pull request makes
qubes-secpack depend on the blockchain in order to prove information
creation *after* a certain point in time, while my suggestion was the
opposite: make the blockchain depend on qubes-secpack in order to prove
informatio
