On 11/17/2017 03:43 AM, Ivan Mitev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans to include the acpi-call kernel module [1] in the
> upcoming R4 kernels ? It's required to set charging thresholds on
> (relatively) newer Thinkpads, which seem to be used by many fellow Qubes
> users and developers.
>
> Exce
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:34:30AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Since we have some time until 4.1, I think it can be F27. But we have
> plans to implement GUI VM there, which means we will not need X server
> (and the whole desktop environment) in dom0 anymore. We will need them
> in
Hi,
Are there any plans to include the acpi-call kernel module [1] in the
upcoming R4 kernels ? It's required to set charging thresholds on
(relatively) newer Thinkpads, which seem to be used by many fellow Qubes
users and developers.
Except compiling/installing a custom kernel, the only "qu
On 17 November 2017 at 19:08, Unman wrote:
> You havent said which version if Qubes you are running.
> in 3.2 the qubes-netvm service may be responsible. You could try
> changing the default netvm, or temporarily disabling the
> qubes-netvm.service and see if that changes behaviour.
>
Oops. Sor
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 02:58:24AM -0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> I have configured sys-net and sys-firewall to only manage the WLAN
> connection. I have
> then set up two separate VM's, foo-net and foo-firewall that manages the
> ethernet
> interface on my computer. The latter is connected a se
I have configured sys-net and sys-firewall to only manage the WLAN
connection. I have
then set up two separate VM's, foo-net and foo-firewall that manages the
ethernet
interface on my computer. The latter is connected a separate network, and
have
dedicated VM's connected to them.
The behaviour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 08:37:47AM -0700, Frédéric Pierret (fepitre) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Maybe you have seen that Fedora 26 is supported for building (see
> qubes-builder) and it is on the road to be officially released (Marek can
> you confirm?) in