Re: [qubes-devel] R4.0-rc4 installation image considerations

Hi Vít, On 30 January 2018 at 14:39, Vít Šesták wrote: > On January 30, 2018 3:12:00 PM GMT+01:00, Andrew Clausen < > andrew.p.clau...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Isn't Memest86+ good for detecting Rowhammer vulnerabilities? > > AFAIK Memtest86+ does not detect it and it is not even

Re: [qubes-devel] R4.0-rc4 installation image considerations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 12:02:12AM -0800, Vít Šesták wrote: > Well, will there be a way to enter the rescue mode by entering a command, or > the user will have to handle all the stuff (LUKS, LVM, mount and chroot) > manually? Yes, it is possible

Re: [qubes-devel] R4.0-rc4 installation image considerations

On January 30, 2018 3:12:00 PM GMT+01:00, Andrew Clausen wrote: >Isn't Memest86+ good for detecting Rowhammer vulnerabilities? AFAIK Memtest86+ does not detect it and it is not even supposed to. My old laptop has passed Memtest86+ test, but it has failed rowhammer

Re: [qubes-devel] R4.0-rc4 installation image considerations

Hi all, On 30 January 2018 at 08:02, Vít Šesták < groups-no-private-mail--contact-me-at--contact.v6ak@v6ak.com> wrote: > > Also, Memtest86+ is probably going to be missing for UEFI without Grub (as > Memtest86+ is 16-bit, so UEFI cannot start it directly), but this is > probably not such

Re: [qubes-devel] R4.0-rc4 installation image considerations

Well, will there be a way to enter the rescue mode by entering a command, or the user will have to handle all the stuff (LUKS, LVM, mount and chroot) manually? For my purposes, I don't care much (i.e., I can handle all of those manually), but I can't imagine giving such advice to a user asking