Thanks!
בתאריך יום ו׳, 12 באפר׳ 2019, 3:05, מאת unman :
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:39:04AM +0300, Claudio Chinicz wrote:
> > On 11/04/2019 3:24, unman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:21:07AM +0300, Claudio Chinicz wrote:
> > > > On 09/04/2019 19:27, 'qmirfw' via qubes-users wrote:
> >
I did your quick test...stopped fine. Good stuff...
Good Whonix-Qubes Links:
https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/whonix/
https://www.whonix.org/
Thanks all,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 09:39:04AM +0300, Claudio Chinicz wrote:
> On 11/04/2019 3:24, unman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:21:07AM +0300, Claudio Chinicz wrote:
> > > On 09/04/2019 19:27, 'qmirfw' via qubes-users wrote:
> > > > On Monday, April 8, 2019 2:44 PM, Claudio Chinicz
> > > >
22...@tutamail.com:
If I am using Whonix-gw and Whonix-ws on Qubes is there in a sense a Tor kill
switch in place by default? i.e. would Whonix-ws, if always connected to
whonix-gw, ONLY transmit data thru Tor? or if the Tor circuit breaks is the
data transferred thru clear-net...
Yes, that
jrsmi...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 1:35:38 PM UTC-7, neovalis wrote:
Low latency game streaming is fantastic and doesn't need a GPU on the
client to work well. Moonlight Stream https://moonlight-stream.org/ is
a great open source project that allows near zero latency game
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 3:25:34 AM UTC-7, unman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:45:02AM -0700, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > If there is no signal on PS/2 ground or I can eliminate it, is this the
> > > more secure route or is it
On 11/04/2019 3:24, unman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:21:07AM +0300, Claudio Chinicz wrote:
On 09/04/2019 19:27, 'qmirfw' via qubes-users wrote:
On Monday, April 8, 2019 2:44 PM, Claudio Chinicz wrote:
Hi All,
My Linux Mint VM works ok when the notebook is connected to wifi only.
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 9:21:22 PM UTC+2, jrsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> That makes sense. I was thinking along the lines of 3K-4K with all of the
> eye candy dialed to Ultra.
You could with a higher end video card.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 11:44:48 AM UTC-7, John Mitchell wrote:
> On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 7:31:49 PM UTC+2, jrsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> > So do I. I just boot Windows for that though. I’m a very curious sort and
> > genuinely don’t understand if you’re playing AAA games at high rez
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 3:25:34 AM UTC-7, unman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 11:45:02AM -0700, jrsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > If there is no signal on PS/2 ground or I can eliminate it, is this the
> > more secure route or is it worth doing the USB shuffle? I have 4 USB
> >
I appreciate the follow up...I have that setup.
My concern is I have to trust the VPN provider...
I used to use Torbirdy in my Whonix-gw Thunderbird a while ago (Installed by
default) but it seems it "...is incompatible with Thunderbird 60.6.1...", at
least that is the message I get when I
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 7:31:49 PM UTC+2, jrsm...@gmail.com wrote:
> So do I. I just boot Windows for that though. I’m a very curious sort and
> genuinely don’t understand if you’re playing AAA games at high rez and frame
> rates. You’ll never get the performance for this use case out of
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 10:12:55 AM UTC-7, 22...@tutamail.com wrote:
> If I am using Whonix-gw and Whonix-ws on Qubes is there in a sense a Tor kill
> switch in place by default? i.e. would Whonix-ws, if always connected to
> whonix-gw, ONLY transmit data thru Tor? or if the Tor circuit
So do I. I just boot Windows for that though. I’m a very curious sort and
genuinely don’t understand if you’re playing AAA games at high rez and frame
rates. You’ll never get the performance for this use case out of a virtualized
environment that you get with native Windows.
--
You received
If I am using Whonix-gw and Whonix-ws on Qubes is there in a sense a Tor kill
switch in place by default? i.e. would Whonix-ws, if always connected to
whonix-gw, ONLY transmit data thru Tor? or if the Tor circuit breaks is the
data transferred thru clear-net...
Thx
--
You received this
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 6:19:22 AM UTC+2, jrsm...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I guess I'm missing a major point. Why would one want to game on Qubes?
Some of us like to have fun! ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To
On Thursday, April 11, 2019 at 4:16:17 AM UTC+1, Sphere wrote:
> @unman Thanks for the clarification. I suppose I misunderstood it wrong since
> I thought you have to set it directly using some sort of text editor and be
> done with it. So I'll have to recompile it I see, welp guess I have no
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:00:47PM +, john s. wrote:
> sorry, after I posted I read your full post , you have an AMD system
>
> so maybe you don't have "intel speedstep" , as it's apparently just intel
>
> on AMD it's called "cool n quiet" if you have that try turning it off
>
>
>
> Xen is difficult to debug without a classic onboard serial port for
> console output. Has to be some bug in that function.
Could Xen print messages to a screen? If yes, then it is possible to
find this function and insert the bunch of printf("1/2/3/etc") //
sleep(1) ( sleep is necessary to
CooSee wrote on 4/6/19 8:07 PM:
however, i assume the combination with very old dom0 + xen + fedora 25 is not
really possible to use on newer hardware.
You might be interested in Qubes 4.1 which will run Fedora 29 in dom0.
It's not ready for release yet, but you could keep an eye out or
For the patching, I modified the xen.spec(.in) file adding the patch to the
already existing set of patches (eg. as Patch628). This way the patch is
applied even after make clean, when the xen sources are gunzipped again.
I also compiled xen-4.12.0 with the patch, and there were no compilation
Mike Banon:
Excellent discovery, awokd and qubes123!
qubes123 gets 100% of the credit, I merely confirmed it.
Please try to somehow upstream your solution to Xen.
Idea: find a way to detect a CPU type before executing this
"recheck_cpu_features(0)"
function, and if it is AMD CPU - maybe just
Excellent discovery, awokd and qubes123!
Please try to somehow upstream your solution to Xen.
Idea: find a way to detect a CPU type before executing this
"recheck_cpu_features(0)"
function, and if it is AMD CPU - maybe just skip this check :
> -if ( !recheck_cpu_features(0) )
> +/*if (
Hello,
On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:43, awokd wrote:
> 799 wrote on 4/10/19 8:37 PM:
> > 'awokd' via qubes-users schrieb am Mi.,
> 10.
> > Apr. 2019, 22:30:
> >
> >> 799 wrote on 4/10/19 8:12 PM:
> >>
> >>>I tried edting the shortcut file in
> >>>
24 matches
Mail list logo