You use systems if you use almost any flavor of Linux. The systemd is a process
that controls so many things on a system that some people joke about it being a
second operating system on top of the Linux kernel. The "security hazard" part
comes from the sheer complexity of that code, because it
On Wed, May 13, 2020, 6:35 AM Eva Star wrote:
>
>
>> Personally, I consider systemd both a mistake & a security hazard,
>>
>>
> Can you please share more details about this? Personally, I don't use both
> of them, but wan't to know.
>
You use systems if you use almost any flavor of Linux. The sy
>
> Personally, I consider systemd both a mistake & a security hazard,
>
>
Can you please share more details about this? Personally, I don't use both
of them, but wan't to know.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe
and just to shred that last bit of misinformation the other two
responses skipped ...
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:44:38AM +, '[NOTIFICATION]' via qubes-users
wrote:
> It would be great if you opened up QUBES for worldwide editing and
> audit and development.
https://github.com/QubesOS/
'[NOTIFICATION]' via qubes-users:
> Do you think QUBES is better than COPPERHEAD or does COPPERHEAD have better
> features than QUBES?
>
> It would be great if you opened up QUBES for worldwide editing and audit and
> development. Or maybe merge with PARROT or TAILS or OPENBSD or WHONIX to
>
Oops. Sent to poster rather than list.
-- Forwarded message -
From: Sandy Harris
Date: Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: [qubes-users] QUBES Friendly Version
To: [NOTIFICATION]
'[NOTIFICATION]' via qubes-users wrote:
> Do you think QUBES is better than
Do you think QUBES is better than COPPERHEAD or does COPPERHEAD have better
features than QUBES?
It would be great if you opened up QUBES for worldwide editing and audit and
development. Or maybe merge with PARROT or TAILS or OPENBSD or WHONIX to
further friendly usability for all people instea
