What i wonderd the most, if bhyve had these features, would it be a more secure
hypervisor then xen for qubes? Since xen has the advantage of having a broader
audience looking at the code for vurnablities, and bhyve has less lines of code
to have vurnerablities in, i wonder what would be prefera
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 1:25 AM, blacklight wrote:
> We all know well why xen was chosen as the hypervisor for qubes instead of
> kvm, since this has been stated in multiple places by the devs. But i wonder
> how feasable it would be to use bhyve as a hypervisor for qubes. Ive read
> that it on
We all know well why xen was chosen as the hypervisor for qubes instead of kvm,
since this has been stated in multiple places by the devs. But i wonder how
feasable it would be to use bhyve as a hypervisor for qubes. Ive read that it
only uses roughly 30k lines of code, so its smaller then xen w
