On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 03:23:54PM -0400, Chris Laprise wrote:
> That also misses the point.
yes, somewhat - thanks for making "the point" clearer! :-)
> Xen is far smaller and simpler than the kernels that protect Windows and
> Linux, and it has fewer vulnerabilities as a result. Its also
On 09/10/2016 07:31 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 04:08:53AM -0700, neilhard...@gmail.com wrote:
Qubes is insecure due to Xen exploits.
[...]
Considering that Snowden is literally advertised on the Qubes home page, I would suggest
the answer is "Yes" The NSA is
Qubes is insecure due to Xen exploits.
Qubes tends to quickly patch the exploits, but we know how it works in the real
world... nation states and other people buy up the exploits before they can get
to the market.
I would also suggest that if you are using Qubes, this may even be a flag at
On Friday, 9 September 2016 09:56:36 UTC+1, neilh...@gmail.com wrote:
> the problem with Qubes, of course, is all the Xen exploits which make it
> insecure.
Off-topic here but is Qubes really insecure? Should I be worried?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
