On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 3:41:43 PM UTC-3, brend...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 1:54:38 PM UTC-4, Fernando wrote:
> > The fix from Marmarek worked for me as soon as it was released, but then
> > after a few updates (I don't remember exactly when) it stopped working for
On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 1:54:38 PM UTC-4, Fernando wrote:
> The fix from Marmarek worked for me as soon as it was released, but then
> after a few updates (I don't remember exactly when) it stopped working for me.
>
> Do you have any suggestions on where I can start looking to debug this i
On Tuesday, December 11, 2018 at 2:00:56 PM UTC-3, Dave C wrote:
> On Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 5:52:31 AM UTC-7, Vít Šesták wrote:
> > Marmarek has identified the issue and fixed it:
> > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4351
> >
>
> I haven't been vocal on this thread in a whi
On Thursday, October 18, 2018 at 5:52:31 AM UTC-7, Vít Šesták wrote:
> Marmarek has identified the issue and fixed it:
> https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4351
>
I haven't been vocal on this thread in a while... but I appreciate the comments
from v6ak and the bugfix from Marmarek.
Marmarek has identified the issue and fixed it:
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/4351
So if you are patient, you can just wait until you see it in current
repository. (There will be likely Gihtub comment.)
If you are eager, you can wait until it is in testing repository. (Again, w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/11/2018 04:03 PM, Vít Šesták wrote:
> I am sorry for the monolog, but I have some further ideas and
> findings.
Hehe, I'm following your progress but I don't have currently the need
of share my screen.
I enjoy reading it and maybe I will test
I am sorry for the monolog, but I have some further ideas and findings.
I see two promising options to make screensharing great again:
a. VM screensharing: It would share the screen of the current VM and nothing
else. We need to get in-VM screenshots working for this. Or you can use a VNC
loopb
Just another idea: Since the video approach is sooo slow, I've tried another
approach. This one is suboptimal by design, but it is much faster than the
recordMyDesktop variant. This one requires a VNC loopback session or other way
of getting another session with its own background. (This is some
I've implemented my approach of screensharing. It pipes content scrapped from
dom0 to a VM. I don't call it a success, because the FPS is terribly low. But
maybe someone can try to get it even further.
Recording:
* VLC and ffmpeg could be good choices (with probably many options for
adjusting i
On February 1, 2018 6:42:08 PM GMT+01:00, Dave C wrote:
>Indeed, I stand corrected. This point could apply to a restrictive
>firewall, but the VM would need to network with the local VM running
>vncserver.
BTW, you could also pipe the network communication through qrexec. This could
be more s
On Sunday, January 28, 2018 at 12:24:08 PM UTC-8, Vít Šesták wrote:
> On January 27, 2018 7:57:02 AM GMT+01:00, Dave C wrote:
> >* VMs that can't access the conference site (i.e. bluejeans.com) or
> >can't access the net at all
>
> How can a VM without network access open a window in the X11 acces
On January 27, 2018 7:57:02 AM GMT+01:00, Dave C wrote:
>* VMs that can't access the conference site (i.e. bluejeans.com) or
>can't access the net at all
How can a VM without network access open a window in the X11 accessible from
network?
>* VMs that don't have vncserver installed, or don't
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 1:34:03 AM UTC-8, Vít Šesták wrote:
> Dave, why you start a new VM and not just use a loopback? Is the reason
> sharing apps from multiple VMs? If si, you are at least significantly
> weakening isolation. Maybe you are not keeping any, not sure. X11 was not
> des
Dave, why you start a new VM and not just use a loopback? Is the reason sharing
apps from multiple VMs? If si, you are at least significantly weakening
isolation. Maybe you are not keeping any, not sure. X11 was not designed for
isolation at all.
Nuno, this is probably possible, but not so triv
I was under the impression that 4.0, by virtue of running on HVM, would
allow for native screensharing (webex, zoom, skype, etc) by simply
disabling seamless mode on the VM you want to share - is this not the case ?
On 01/24/2018 07:25 AM, Dave C wrote:
> I hope no one minds reviving an old threa
I hope no one minds reviving an old thread...
I recently needed to screenshare in Qubes (4.x, but 3.2 should work the same).
I wrote up my notes:
https://www.dave-cohen.com/blog/qubes-vnc-screenshare/
Feedback welcome, especially if the method can be improved. Thanks.
--
You received this m
16 matches
Mail list logo