On 12/02/2017 03:11 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 11/23/2017 07:55 AM, Leo Gaspard wrote:
>
>> Can you please avoid ranting against secure boot once again?
>>
>> Secure boot is *not* useless. It *does* bring security benefits,
>> although not as good as measured boot with a TPM: it requires an
>
On 11/23/2017 07:55 AM, Leo Gaspard wrote:
Can you please avoid ranting against secure boot once again?
Secure boot is *not* useless. It *does* bring security benefits,
although not as good as measured boot with a TPM: it requires an
additional flaw somewhere in the {BIOS, bootloader} to bypass
Gesendet von ProtonMail mobile
Original-Nachricht
An 1. Dez. 2017, 17:15, Andrew Eason schrieb:
> Couloutac mentioned Richard Stallman's comments. I was curious what he said,
> so I looked it up.
>
> There is an addendum at the bottom to his original essay.
>
> from the bottom
Couloutac mentioned Richard Stallman's comments. I was curious what he
said, so I looked it up.
There is an addendum at the bottom to his original essay.
from the bottom of the essay at
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/can-you-trust.html
(I added a * to the most relevant line):
As of 2015, treach
Thanks for the replies. I generally dislike secure boot, and even UEFI. I was
mainly asking since I couldn't find a clear answer...and if it was possible,
why not do it!
Other distributions use a shim bootloader signed with a Microsoft key. It
might be adventitious for QubesOS to do the same
On Thursday, November 23, 2017 at 7:55:21 AM UTC-5, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> On 11/23/2017 03:35 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> > On 11/22/2017 07:25 PM, xeph...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> This is quite late, but now that UEFI is supported...is secure boot?
> >> Wasn't quite sure what key or signature to imp
>
> > This is quite late, but now that UEFI is supported...is secure boot?
> > Wasn't quite sure what key or signature to import.
> Why are all the newbies here so obsessed with a microsoft technology?
>
> Just shut it off, it provides no benefit to you. If their code is so
> great and benefic
On 11/23/2017 03:35 AM, taii...@gmx.com wrote:
> On 11/22/2017 07:25 PM, xeph...@gmail.com wrote:
>> This is quite late, but now that UEFI is supported...is secure boot?
>> Wasn't quite sure what key or signature to import.
> Why are all the newbies here so obsessed with a microsoft technology?
>
On 11/22/2017 07:25 PM, xeph...@gmail.com wrote:
This is quite late, but now that UEFI is supported...is secure boot? Wasn't
quite sure what key or signature to import.
Why are all the newbies here so obsessed with a microsoft technology?
Just shut it off, it provides no benefit to you. If t
This is quite late, but now that UEFI is supported...is secure boot? Wasn't
quite sure what key or signature to import.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an em
10 matches
Mail list logo
