вторник, 28 июня 2016 г., 17:37:57 UTC+3 пользователь Chris Laprise написал:
> On 06/27/2016 09:47 PM, indoler...@gmail.com wrote:
> > What are the tradeoffs between btfs, lvm, and lvm with thin provisioning 
> > WRT speed and space efficiency?
> >
> 
> Both btrfs and (thin) lvm do similar things with copy-on-write, though I 
> have not seen direct comparisons of speed between them. Btrfs is more 
> flexible by far, though, and its what I use for Qubes. Regular lvm is 
> just a hassle and IMO only good for snapshots that are immediately 
> created and destroyed for backup procedures.
> 
> Qubes will automatically use reflinks whenever it clones vm disk images, 
> which is a COW copy that happens instantly and only allocates extra data 
> blocks when blocks are changed in either copy. It allows a lot of 
> experimentation to be done at virtually no cost in disk space, for 
> instance. This happens on a per-vm (actually, per-file) basis, without 
> having to do whole-filesystem snapshots as in lvm. This makes btrfs 
> potentially much more space efficient than the rest if you make use of 
> cloning. Btrfs also has compression.
> 
> Its worth noting that vm images suffer from logical fragmentation 
> because writing to disk image files behaves like random database 
> updates. Because btrfs does COW on *every* write, it does make it slower 
> than ext4 but on Qubes not noticeably so. Qubes vm images are sparse, so 
> whenever deletions occur this fragments ext4 filesystems and slows them 
> down also.
> 
> The fastest filesystem to use in dom0 is probably ext4 *without* lvm. 
> Turning off 'discard' in the vm's /rw volume may prevent some 
> sparse-related slowdown (at a cost in disk space). With lvm, ext4 will 
> probably become slower than btrfs as soon as you start making snapshots 
> and updates.
> 
> Beyond that, I think its possible to assign a raw block device to a vm, 
> though I haven't explored that yet. Ext4 on a raw block device would be 
> the fastest, but not flexible or space efficient.
> 
> Chris

Hello Chris,

Thank you so much for your answer

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/77ff3000-2a24-447b-b54b-a0d51a2c9d2e%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to