Re: [qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?

2020-02-12 Thread Claudio Chinicz
Hi Sven, thanks for the explanation of how mail clients work. I've realized mutt is not for me, I need a GUI and I'll have to continue using TB or similar, regardless of split gpg. Best Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To

Re: [qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?

2020-02-12 Thread Sven Semmler
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 09:48:52PM -0800, Claudio Chinicz wrote: > Can you provide more details on mutt and how to implement its use with > Qubes (and TB I suppose)? Hi Claudio, modern email clients like Thunderbird combine serveral functions into one software package: - mail user agent (MUA) -

Re: [qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?

2020-02-11 Thread Claudio Chinicz
Hi Sven, Can you provide more details on mutt and how to implement its use with Qubes (and TB I suppose)? Thanks in advance On Tuesday, 11 February 2020 19:35:27 UTC+2, Sven Semmler wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:06:23AM -0800, Claudio Chinicz wrote: > > I've just read this post from TB

Re: split-mail setups (was: Re: [qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?)

2020-02-11 Thread tetrahedra via qubes-users
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:53:58PM -0600, Sven Semmler wrote: mutt in a no-netvm mua-vault? with fetchmail-vms feeding it through qubesrpc-procmail? and separate vms for qubesrpc-msmtp for sending? or msmtp-vms mixed with the fetchmail-vms based on credentials-overlap? but, yes. not really a sol

Re: split-mail setups (was: Re: [qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?)

2020-02-11 Thread Sven Semmler
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 09:13:36PM +0100, dhorf-hfref.4a288...@hashmail.org wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Sven Semmler wrote: > > Makes me happy I switched to mutt late last year. But that's not really > > a solution for the masses. > > mutt in a no-netvm mua-vault? > with fe

split-mail setups (was: Re: [qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?)

2020-02-11 Thread dhorf-hfref . 4a288f10
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Sven Semmler wrote: > Makes me happy I switched to mutt late last year. But that's not really > a solution for the masses. mutt in a no-netvm mua-vault? with fetchmail-vms feeding it through qubesrpc-procmail? and separate vms for qubesrpc-msmtp for sendin

Re: [qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?

2020-02-11 Thread Sven Semmler
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:06:23AM -0800, Claudio Chinicz wrote: > I've just read this post from TB > (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:OpenPGP:2020) and do not know if it > will support Qubes Split gpg without Enigmail? > Anyone knows? If I understand the Wiki entry correctly the Thunderbir

[qubes-users] Will Thunderbird 78 kill Qubes Split gpg?

2020-02-11 Thread Claudio Chinicz
Hi All, I've just read this post from TB (https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:OpenPGP:2020) and do not know if it will support Qubes Split gpg without Enigmail? Anyone knows? Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsub