thank you unman. I tried to use it as sys-net, but
1) network-manager did not start on boot
2) when starting it by hand, I got the impression that the
network-manager data is stored elsewhere under debian than under fedora
- to the effect that I lost all saved wireless connections!
Is there
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 11:34:24AM +1100, haaber wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:47:44PM +1100, haaber wrote:
> > > Hello, does someone know if the debian-9-minimal template is pre- or
> > > post- APT-vulnerability? Is it being "maintained" as well as debian-9
> > > itself? Thank you,
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:47:44PM +1100, haaber wrote:
Hello, does someone know if the debian-9-minimal template is pre- or
post- APT-vulnerability? Is it being "maintained" as well as debian-9
itself? Thank you, Bernhard
The debian-9-minimal template in the templates-itl-testing
On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 04:47:44PM +1100, haaber wrote:
> Hello, does someone know if the debian-9-minimal template is pre- or
> post- APT-vulnerability? Is it being "maintained" as well as debian-9
> itself? Thank you, Bernhard
>
>
The debian-9-minimal template in the templates-itl-testing
Hello, does someone know if the debian-9-minimal template is pre- or
post- APT-vulnerability? Is it being "maintained" as well as debian-9
itself? Thank you, Bernhard
On 1/12/19 2:25 AM, Zrubi wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/10/19 1:14 AM, unman wrote:
If any
On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 04:25:00PM +0100, Zrubi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 1/10/19 1:14 AM, unman wrote:
> > If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal
> > template currently available in itl-testing.
>
> would you mind sending the output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/10/19 1:14 AM, unman wrote:
> If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal
> template currently available in itl-testing.
would you mind sending the output of
dpkg -l
Thanks.
- --
Zrubi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 06:33:13PM +0100, 799 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am Do., 10. Jan. 2019, 01:15 hat unman
> geschrieben:
>
> > If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal template
> > currently available in itl-testing.
>
> You can install it:
> > qubes-dom0-update
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 11:50:04 AM UTC, unman wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:43:41PM -0800, seshu wrote:
> > On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 12:30:11 AM UTC, unman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +, unman wrote:
> > > > If any one is interested there's a
Hello,
Am Do., 10. Jan. 2019, 01:15 hat unman
geschrieben:
> If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal template
> currently available in itl-testing.
You can install it:
> qubes-dom0-update --enablerepo=qubes-template-itl-testing
> qubes-template-debian-9-minimal
>
Short
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:43:41PM -0800, seshu wrote:
> On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 12:30:11 AM UTC, unman wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +, unman wrote:
> > > If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal template
> > > currently available in itl-testing.
>
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 at 12:30:11 AM UTC, unman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +, unman wrote:
> > If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal template
> > currently available in itl-testing.
> > You can install it:
> > qubes-dom0-update
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +, unman wrote:
> If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal template
> currently available in itl-testing.
> You can install it:
> qubes-dom0-update --enablerepo=qubes-template-itl-testing
> qubes-template-debian-9-minimal
>
> The
If any one is interested there's a prebuilt debian-9-minimal template
currently available in itl-testing.
You can install it:
qubes-dom0-update --enablerepo=qubes-template-itl-testing
qubes-template-debian-9-minimal
The template is a little smaller than stock stretch, and somewhat
leaner. To get
Hi Unman & ubestemt,
thank you for your patience. I followed Unmans hints. The difference is
that, due to no-full-fedora-appvm-working-error I was using a
f-24-minimal als starting point. This is bad, since minimal means
minimal.. so the setup script failed miserably several times without
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 02:38:18PM +0200, Bernhard wrote:
> Hello,
> I ask again about a debian-8/9-minimal (preferably with coldkernel). I
> know there was already a discussion on the subject, but I could not
> gather enough information yet to start myself. There is a conf file
>
Are these instructions of any help? You basically just follow the
instructions for building Arch.
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/20170428154944.xt4ggq6xhhd3wxe3%40bestemt.no
--
ubestemt
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users"
Hello,
I ask again about a debian-8/9-minimal (preferably with coldkernel). I
know there was already a discussion on the subject, but I could not
gather enough information yet to start myself. There is a conf file
debian-8-minimal-3.0.2-201505170018.conf on github. The date "2015" is
not
On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 18:18:42 UTC+10, Ben Wika wrote:
> Perhaps I'm blind but I'm not seeing any mini package list in this thread.
> Only a discussion about who was going to post one.
>
> On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 10:06:50 UTC+10, Unman wrote:On Sun, Jun 19, 2016
> at 07:39:45PM -0700,
Perhaps I'm blind but I'm not seeing any mini package list in this thread.
Only a discussion about who was going to post one.
On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 10:06:50 UTC+10, Unman wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 07:39:45PM -0700, Ben Wika wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not sure what's been happening on
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 07:39:45PM -0700, Ben Wika wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure what's been happening on this subject since September (maybe
> discussion has moved?) but thought I'd make a contribution. Pretty new to
> some of this so appreciate the feedback.
>
> If we install the base qubes
21 matches
Mail list logo