If i have intel processor with the vPro technology - should i afraid some
"factory vulnerabilities" of that technology and some manipulation with my
BIOS. Or security of Qubes is higher of that level?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" gr
On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 5:47:33 PM UTC+7, Andrew David Wong wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 2016-11-16 00:03, nezna...@xy9ce.tk wrote:
> > If i have intel processor with the vPro technology - should i afraid some
> > "factory vulnerabilities" of that te
vPro = bad.
That GitHub page does not recommend vPro. It states that AEM uses a feature
of vPro to detect if vPro software (BIOS) has been tampered with while you
were away. Then you can throw your computer in the trash when AEM throws up
a red flag.
--
You received this message because you
On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 11:43:21 PM UTC+7, sevas wrote:
> vPro = bad.
>
> That GitHub page does not recommend vPro. It states that AEM uses a feature
> of vPro to detect if vPro software (BIOS) has been tampered with while you
> were away. Then you can throw your computer in the trash when
vPro is a set of ME programs for insecure remote management (vs the
secure owner controlled remote management of OpenBMC) but ME is always
on, always capable of remote access and impossible to disable no matter
what - possibly the best industrial espionage utility ever invented and
not really y
I hope the authors of
https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FQubesOS%2Fqubes-antievilmaid%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fanti-evil-maid%2FREADME&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNHdTSlMQuiFYmS9hEEQkF8C_fwjIQ
would say something here.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
I hope the authors of
https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-antievilmaid/blob/master/anti-evil-maid/README
would say something here.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, se
Some Intel processors have Intel TXT without vPro.
https://ark.intel.com/products/93339/Intel-Core-i7-6785R-Processor-8M-Cache-up-to-3_90-GHz
And the GitHub page also says
"http://blog.invisiblethings.org/2011/09/07/anti-evil-maid.html
(Note that this article is somewhat outdated, e.g. AEM uses I
Intel ME (2006+ systems)/AMD PSP (for FM2/AM4), malicious firmware,
exploits for the various devices on your system (the IOMMU is
initialized too late on x86 to protect the host from DMA exploits in the
pre-OS boot window)
The sky truly is the limit.
If you want *reasonably* secure computing y
Accidentally sent before I was finished, didn't include:
https://www.crowdsupply.com/raptorcs/talos - open source hardware, thus
making it more difficult for unaccountable hardware backdoors (ME =
software supported by hardware VS a true hardware backdoor)
There are ARM devices like the Novena
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-11-16 00:03, nezna...@xy9ce.tk wrote:
> If i have intel processor with the vPro technology - should i afraid some
> "factory vulnerabilities" of that technology and some manipulation with my
> BIOS. Or security of Qubes is higher of that le
11 matches
Mail list logo
