Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-05 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: > On 16/06/23 00:28, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:41:12AM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > what would I need to do to update

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-13 Thread pixel fairy
i think fedora24 should be the default template for qubes 3.2. were all testing it, cant see any problems. we cant have an EOL release for appvms. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-27 Thread Zrubi
On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 > template. > > TL;DR version: > 1. Clone fedora-23 to fedora-24-test. > 2. Open terminal in fedora-24-test. > 3. Run "dnf upgrade --releasever=24". > 4. Shutdown the

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-27 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 09/06/2016 11:10 AM, Achim Patzner wrote: > Some key bindings might have changed; ctrl-"+" in a terminal window > increases the font size but the terminal window does not grow with it > anymore. Finally! The GNOME people finally unfucked Ctrl++! -- Rudd-O http://rudd-o.com/ -- You

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-27 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:56AM +0200, Zrubi wrote: > On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 > > template. > > > > TL;DR version: > > 1. Clone fedora-

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-27 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:56AM +0200, Zrubi wrote: > > On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > > > I've just tried this and successfully upgrad

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Zrubi
On 10/27/2016 03:31 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > I haven't tried recently, but it worked before. Maybe a workaround would > be to disable "updates" repository for the upgrade time? Just add > --disablerepo=updates. I do not understand the reason - but it was worked this way - thanks.

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Zrubi
On 10/28/2016 10:06 AM, Zrubi wrote: > On 10/27/2016 03:31 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > >> I haven't tried recently, but it worked before. Maybe a workaround would >> be to disable "updates" repository for the upgrade time? Just add >> --disablerepo=updates. > > I do not understand the

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0200, Zrubi wrote: > On 10/28/2016 10:06 AM, Zrubi wrote: > > On 10/27/2016 03:31 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > >> I haven't tried recently, but it worked before. Maybe a workaround would > >> be to

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Zrubi
On 10/28/2016 10:46 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Wait a sec, qubes-gui-vm-3.1.7 ? Is this Qubes 3.1? We don't have fc24 > support there... Well no. It is Qubes 3.2 - but a restored template. Maybe I just messed up something related to 3.1 -> 3.2 upgrade? However to template is working

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Zrubi wrote: > On 10/28/2016 10:46 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > Wait a sec, qubes-gui-vm-3.1.7 ? Is this Qubes 3.1? We don't have fc24 > > support there... > > Well no. It is Qubes 3.2 - but

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 10/28/2016 01:56 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:56AM +0200, Zrubi wrote: > >> On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > >> > >>> I've just tried this and suc

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Laszlo Zrubecz
On 10/28/2016 11:20 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > It looks so... See here: > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/upgrade-to-r3.2/#upgrade-all-template-and-standalone-vms It was not made a difference - only the package versions changed, the error is the same. so I'm still stucked with broken d

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:28:31AM +, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote: > On 10/28/2016 01:56 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:5

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:37:02AM +0200, Laszlo Zrubecz wrote: > On 10/28/2016 11:20 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > It looks so... See here: > > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/upgrade-to-r3.2/#upgrade-all-template-and-standalone-vms > >

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Zrubi
On 10/28/2016 11:44 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Or maybe > it's still at 3.1 there (and the updated one saved in .rpmnew file)? That was the case. My templates are updated to fc24 now. A few notes about this: - skipping the template upgrade from 3.1 has no immediate visible effec

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 10/28/2016 09:40 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > Actually yes, we may hook qubes-gui-agent.service into graphical.target > and call it "display manager", preventing others from running. This is > good idea, but something I'd like to avoid as a stable update - so, for > Qubes 4.0. Yes,

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-28 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:56:28PM +0200, Zrubi wrote: > On 10/28/2016 11:44 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > Or maybe > > it's still at 3.1 there (and the updated one saved in .rpmnew file)? > > That was the case. > My templates are upd

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Foppe de Haan
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 1:24:09 AM UTC+2, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: > > On 16/06/23 00:28, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:24:54AM -0700, Foppe de Haan wrote: > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 1:24:09 AM UTC+2, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:27:09AM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote: > Am 06.09.2016 um 01:24 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 > > template. > > > > TL;DR version: > > 1. Clone fe

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Foppe de Haan
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:17:10 AM UTC+2, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:24:54AM -0700, Foppe de Haan wrote: > > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 1:24:09 AM UTC+2, Marek > > Marczykowski-Górecki wrote

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 06.09.2016 um 11:30 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > Does anyone have a simple tool to diff the rpm inventory of two machines > > and apply everything that is not installed in the target machine? 8-) > > rpm -qa |sort > pkg_list > Then diff those files... I hoped there was an easier way

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 06.09.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > Just some standard usage things, like: > - networking (like standard web browsing) Working. > - updates / package installation (is it working at all? does new apps >show up in the menu?) Working. > - emails (for example if Qube

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:07:49PM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote: > Am 06.09.2016 um 11:30 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > There are no fc24 packages for R3.1. So if you're starting with R3.1 > > template, first you need to upgrade it to R3.2. >

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:10:51PM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote: > Am 06.09.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > Just some standard usage things, like: > > - networking (like standard web browsing) > > Working. > > > - updates / pa

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread Torsten Grote
On 09/05/2016 08:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > Please, if any of you have a chance, test such template. I had to resize the system partition, because the upgrade was too big to fit on it. Automatic resizing didn't work. I had to run resize2fs manually. The upgrade went through smooth

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-06 Thread pixel fairy
> On 09/05/2016 08:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > Please, if any of you have a chance, test such template. Whats the time frame on 3.2? fedora 25 is out in november. would it be worth it to wait? or just make an updated template then? would also be good to have a newer set of graph

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-07 Thread Connor Page
I upgraded all fedora-based vms to 24 about a month ago when I noticed a qubes repo for that. all upgrades went smooth but I suggest backups first because of different versions of software. things may break if you switch back to 23. I had this problem with remmina, it couldn't work properly with

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-07 Thread Connor Page
and forgot to mention, I followed the documentation for upgrade from 21 to 23, i.e. used an additional disk image for cache and modules. otherwise it would fail with my densely populated templates. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-07 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:44:35PM -0700, pixel fairy wrote: > > On 09/05/2016 08:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > Please, if any of you have a chance, test such template. > > Whats the time frame on 3.2? fedora 25 is out in november.

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-08 Thread pixel fairy
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:40:24 AM UTC-7, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > For Qubes 4.0 it hasn't been decided yet (most likely will be Fedora > 23 too). But hopefully we'll have newer kernel there. I'd aim for 4.8. looks like fedora 23 will be EOL in 3-4 months. https://fedor

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-08 Thread Steve Coleman
On 09/05/2016 07:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24 template. TL;DR version: 1. Clone fedora-23 to fedora-24-test. 2. Open terminal in fedora-24-test. 3. Run "dnf upgrade --releasever=24". 4. Shutdown the template. 5.

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-09 Thread Andrew David Wong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 2016-09-08 05:14, pixel fairy wrote: > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:40:24 AM UTC-7, Marek > Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > >> >> For Qubes 4.0 it hasn't been decided yet (most likely will be >> Fedora 23 too). But hopefully we'll have new

Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-11 Thread pixel fairy
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:24:09 PM UTC-7, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote: > > On 16/06/23 00:28, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11

Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-14 Thread Noses
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT) pixel fairy wrote: i think fedora24 should be the default template for qubes 3.2. were all testing it, cant see any problems. we cant have an EOL release for appvms. Ok, as everybody was looking for a problem, I finally found one. I've been bitten by

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-14 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:01:19PM +0100, Noses wrote: > On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT) > pixel fairy wrote: > > i think fedora24 should be the default template for qubes 3.2. were all > > testing it, cant see any problems. we cant have a

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-14 Thread Achim Patzner
Am 14.09.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > Ok, as everybody was looking for a problem, I finally found one. > I've been > > bitten by this > > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1770311 > ("/etc/resolv.conf > > missing once NetworkManager is stopped") and don't reall

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-14 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:27:20PM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote: > Am 14.09.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki: > > > Ok, as everybody was looking for a problem, I finally found one. > > I've been > > > bitten by this > > > http://forums.

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-15 Thread J. Eppler
Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released in November/December and will use Wayland per default. Would it not be better to skip Fedora 24 and focus on resources and efforts on Fedora 25? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-16 Thread Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:41:37PM -0700, J. Eppler wrote: > Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released in > November/December and will use Wayland per default. Would it not be better to > skip Fedora 24 and focus on

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-09-24 Thread Sebastian Jug
On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 4:37:17 AM UTC-4, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:41:37PM -0700, J. Eppler wrote: > > Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released > > in November/D

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-10 Thread pixel fairy
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 8:04:54 PM UTC-7, Sebastian Jug wrote: > On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 4:37:17 AM UTC-4, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:41:37PM -0700, J. Eppler wrote: > > > Is it

Re: Negative test result for fedora 24... Was: Re: Request for test: Re: [qubes-users] Fedora 24?

2016-10-27 Thread Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)
On 09/16/2016 04:41 AM, J. Eppler wrote: > Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released in > November/December and will use Wayland per default. Would it not be better to > skip Fedora 24 and focus on resources and efforts on Fedora 25? > We will not get to Fedora 2