-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> On 16/06/23 00:28, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:41:12AM +0200, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > what would I need to do to update
i think fedora24 should be the default template for qubes 3.2. were all testing
it, cant see any problems. we cant have an EOL release for appvms.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24
> template.
>
> TL;DR version:
> 1. Clone fedora-23 to fedora-24-test.
> 2. Open terminal in fedora-24-test.
> 3. Run "dnf upgrade --releasever=24".
> 4. Shutdown the
On 09/06/2016 11:10 AM, Achim Patzner wrote:
> Some key bindings might have changed; ctrl-"+" in a terminal window
> increases the font size but the terminal window does not grow with it
> anymore.
Finally! The GNOME people finally unfucked Ctrl++!
--
Rudd-O
http://rudd-o.com/
--
You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:56AM +0200, Zrubi wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
> > I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24
> > template.
> >
> > TL;DR version:
> > 1. Clone fedora-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:56AM +0200, Zrubi wrote:
> > On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> >
> > > I've just tried this and successfully upgrad
On 10/27/2016 03:31 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> I haven't tried recently, but it worked before. Maybe a workaround would
> be to disable "updates" repository for the upgrade time? Just add
> --disablerepo=updates.
I do not understand the reason - but it was worked this way - thanks.
On 10/28/2016 10:06 AM, Zrubi wrote:
> On 10/27/2016 03:31 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
>> I haven't tried recently, but it worked before. Maybe a workaround would
>> be to disable "updates" repository for the upgrade time? Just add
>> --disablerepo=updates.
>
> I do not understand the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:32:12AM +0200, Zrubi wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 10:06 AM, Zrubi wrote:
> > On 10/27/2016 03:31 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> >
> >> I haven't tried recently, but it worked before. Maybe a workaround would
> >> be to
On 10/28/2016 10:46 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Wait a sec, qubes-gui-vm-3.1.7 ? Is this Qubes 3.1? We don't have fc24
> support there...
Well no. It is Qubes 3.2 - but a restored template.
Maybe I just messed up something related to 3.1 -> 3.2 upgrade?
However to template is working
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:51:43AM +0200, Zrubi wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 10:46 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
> > Wait a sec, qubes-gui-vm-3.1.7 ? Is this Qubes 3.1? We don't have fc24
> > support there...
>
> Well no. It is Qubes 3.2 - but
On 10/28/2016 01:56 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:50:56AM +0200, Zrubi wrote:
> >> On 09/06/2016 01:24 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've just tried this and suc
On 10/28/2016 11:20 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> It looks so... See here:
> https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/upgrade-to-r3.2/#upgrade-all-template-and-standalone-vms
It was not made a difference - only the package versions changed, the
error is the same.
so I'm still stucked with broken d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:28:31AM +, Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 01:56 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0200, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:37:02AM +0200, Laszlo Zrubecz wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 11:20 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
> > It looks so... See here:
> > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/upgrade-to-r3.2/#upgrade-all-template-and-standalone-vms
>
>
On 10/28/2016 11:44 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Or maybe
> it's still at 3.1 there (and the updated one saved in .rpmnew file)?
That was the case.
My templates are updated to fc24 now.
A few notes about this:
- skipping the template upgrade from 3.1 has no immediate visible
effec
On 10/28/2016 09:40 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
> Actually yes, we may hook qubes-gui-agent.service into graphical.target
> and call it "display manager", preventing others from running. This is
> good idea, but something I'd like to avoid as a stable update - so, for
> Qubes 4.0.
Yes,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:56:28PM +0200, Zrubi wrote:
> On 10/28/2016 11:44 AM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
> > Or maybe
> > it's still at 3.1 there (and the updated one saved in .rpmnew file)?
>
> That was the case.
> My templates are upd
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 1:24:09 AM UTC+2, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> > On 16/06/23 00:28, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:24:54AM -0700, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 1:24:09 AM UTC+2, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:27:09AM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote:
> Am 06.09.2016 um 01:24 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24
> > template.
> >
> > TL;DR version:
> > 1. Clone fe
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:17:10 AM UTC+2, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 12:24:54AM -0700, Foppe de Haan wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 1:24:09 AM UTC+2, Marek
> > Marczykowski-Górecki wrote
Am 06.09.2016 um 11:30 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > Does anyone have a simple tool to diff the rpm inventory of two machines
> > and apply everything that is not installed in the target machine? 8-)
>
> rpm -qa |sort > pkg_list
> Then diff those files...
I hoped there was an easier way
Am 06.09.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> Just some standard usage things, like:
> - networking (like standard web browsing)
Working.
> - updates / package installation (is it working at all? does new apps
>show up in the menu?)
Working.
> - emails (for example if Qube
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:07:49PM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote:
> Am 06.09.2016 um 11:30 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > There are no fc24 packages for R3.1. So if you're starting with R3.1
> > template, first you need to upgrade it to R3.2.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 01:10:51PM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote:
> Am 06.09.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > Just some standard usage things, like:
> > - networking (like standard web browsing)
>
> Working.
>
> > - updates / pa
On 09/05/2016 08:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> Please, if any of you have a chance, test such template.
I had to resize the system partition, because the upgrade was too big to
fit on it. Automatic resizing didn't work. I had to run resize2fs manually.
The upgrade went through smooth
> On 09/05/2016 08:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > Please, if any of you have a chance, test such template.
Whats the time frame on 3.2? fedora 25 is out in november. would it be worth it
to wait? or just make an updated template then?
would also be good to have a newer set of graph
I upgraded all fedora-based vms to 24 about a month ago when I noticed a qubes
repo for that. all upgrades went smooth but I suggest backups first because of
different versions of software. things may break if you switch back to 23. I
had this problem with remmina, it couldn't work properly with
and forgot to mention, I followed the documentation for upgrade from 21 to 23,
i.e. used an additional disk image for cache and modules. otherwise it would
fail with my densely populated templates.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"qubes-users" group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 08:44:35PM -0700, pixel fairy wrote:
> > On 09/05/2016 08:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > Please, if any of you have a chance, test such template.
>
> Whats the time frame on 3.2? fedora 25 is out in november.
On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:40:24 AM UTC-7, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
>
> For Qubes 4.0 it hasn't been decided yet (most likely will be Fedora
> 23 too). But hopefully we'll have newer kernel there. I'd aim for 4.8.
looks like fedora 23 will be EOL in 3-4 months.
https://fedor
On 09/05/2016 07:24 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
I've just tried this and successfully upgraded Fedora 23 to Fedora 24
template.
TL;DR version:
1. Clone fedora-23 to fedora-24-test.
2. Open terminal in fedora-24-test.
3. Run "dnf upgrade --releasever=24".
4. Shutdown the template.
5.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 2016-09-08 05:14, pixel fairy wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 at 6:40:24 AM UTC-7, Marek
> Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
>
>>
>> For Qubes 4.0 it hasn't been decided yet (most likely will be
>> Fedora 23 too). But hopefully we'll have new
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 4:24:09 PM UTC-7, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:31:46PM +0200, Niels Kobschaetzki wrote:
> > On 16/06/23 00:28, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11
On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
pixel fairy wrote:
i think fedora24 should be the default template for
qubes 3.2. were all testing it, cant see any problems. we
cant have an EOL release for appvms.
Ok, as everybody was looking for a problem, I finally found one. I've been
bitten by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:01:19PM +0100, Noses wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:35:20 -0700 (PDT)
> pixel fairy wrote:
> > i think fedora24 should be the default template for qubes 3.2. were all
> > testing it, cant see any problems. we cant have a
Am 14.09.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > Ok, as everybody was looking for a problem, I finally found one.
> I've been
> > bitten by this
> > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?p=1770311
> ("/etc/resolv.conf
> > missing once NetworkManager is stopped") and don't reall
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:27:20PM +0200, Achim Patzner wrote:
> Am 14.09.2016 um 23:16 schrieb Marek Marczykowski-Górecki:
> > > Ok, as everybody was looking for a problem, I finally found one.
> > I've been
> > > bitten by this
> > > http://forums.
Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released in
November/December and will use Wayland per default. Would it not be better to
skip Fedora 24 and focus on resources and efforts on Fedora 25?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:41:37PM -0700, J. Eppler wrote:
> Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released in
> November/December and will use Wayland per default. Would it not be better to
> skip Fedora 24 and focus on
On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 4:37:17 AM UTC-4, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:41:37PM -0700, J. Eppler wrote:
> > Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released
> > in November/D
On Saturday, September 24, 2016 at 8:04:54 PM UTC-7, Sebastian Jug wrote:
> On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 4:37:17 AM UTC-4, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:41:37PM -0700, J. Eppler wrote:
> > > Is it
On 09/16/2016 04:41 AM, J. Eppler wrote:
> Is it a good idea to spend time on fedora 24? Fedora 25 should be released in
> November/December and will use Wayland per default. Would it not be better to
> skip Fedora 24 and focus on resources and efforts on Fedora 25?
>
We will not get to Fedora 2
44 matches
Mail list logo