On 1 Apr 2007, at 21:44, Spoon wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've noticed something I find very strange on the systems I have to
> work
> with. Every time I reboot the computer, the clock skew of the local
> clock changes, sometimes by what seems to be a huge amount.
>
> For example, I boot the c
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Harlan Stenn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny
>Mayer) writes:
>
>P> As you might have seen elsewhere I do agree that this is only a good
>P> idea under well defined circumstances, and I would now add that it is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes:
> Which point would that be? Having NTP servers with varying addresses is
> a good idea?
It appears to me that pools is on the verge of collapse from way too
high a load. There are only ~1000 pools servers right now. (ref:
http://www.pool.ntp.org/ right
Danny,
It's not worth the trouble to me to do the things you requested.
H
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.isc.org
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
Harlan Stenn wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes:
>
> P> As you might have seen elsewhere I do agree that this is only a good
> P> idea under well defined circumstances, and I would now add that it is
> P> difficult to ascertain up-front whether thes
Consider plotting the value. If you are really looking at at 12 hour cycle,
it could be related to room temp (or CPU temp) based on AM/PM stuff.
H
___
questions mailing list
questions@lists.ntp.isc.org
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questio
Hello everyone,
I've noticed something I find very strange on the systems I have to work
with. Every time I reboot the computer, the clock skew of the local
clock changes, sometimes by what seems to be a huge amount.
For example, I boot the computer, let ntpd run for 12 hours, and the
value re
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes:
P> As you might have seen elsewhere I do agree that this is only a good
P> idea under well defined circumstances, and I would now add that it is
P> difficult to ascertain up-front whether these conditions are met (i.e.
P>
Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> Danny Mayer wrote:
>> Jan Ceuleers wrote:
>>> (I suggested that pool members with non-static IP addresses could be
>>> accommodated by the pool).
>> Well you shouldn't have. It just won't work for any useful time period.
>
> Well excuse me for thinking out loud...
Sorry if
