Michael L. Semon wrote:
> 1) Use my current Linux 2.6.18.1 + LinuxPPS and sit and watch as ntpd
> darts +/- 120 us over the course of a few hours, even when idle.
>
> 2) Reboot to FreeBSD and let the kernel, hardpps, and the NTP kernel
> code make more radical short-term adjustments, and ntpd will
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Burnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Unlike with FreeBSD (AFAIK) there are a large number of Linux
Martin> distributions with a large number of versions each, and thus a large
Martin> number of different kernel versions are running out there, so t
Riccardo,
What you describe can work.
Please see:
http://ntp.isc.org/Support/ConfiguringLocalRefclocks
http://ntp.isc.org/Support/OrphanMode
H
___
questions mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ntp.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> OK, I want to say that Server A, Server B are internal servers and i'm
> going to use two machine for this reason:
>
> If Server A is not reachable, it's possible to reach server B, it's a
> backup question !
> What do you think ?
I th
Hal Murray wrote:
>>No. Even the hardware of ten to fifteen years ago has sufficient
>>capacity to run ntpd. I run ntpd on Sun Ultra 10 machines with 440 MHz
>>CPU's (late 1990's vintage).
>
>
> Are you using PPS? Does your kernel have hardpps?
Yes, I'm using PPS. I have no idea if the stand
Steve Kostecke wrote:
> On 2007-04-13, RICCARDO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I want to use ntpd -qg, it could be right this ntp.conf for my Linux
>>client ?
>
>
>>restrict default ignore
>>restrict 127.0.0.1
>>restrict server A
>>restrict server B
>
>
> You could simplify this greatly by
OK, I want to say that Server A, Server B are internal servers and i'm
going to use two machine for this reason:
If Server A is not reachable, it's possible to reach server B, it's a
backup question !
What do you think ?
Messaggio originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 13/04/2007 15.21
On 2007-04-13, RICCARDO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want to use ntpd -qg, it could be right this ntp.conf for my Linux
> client ?
> restrict default ignore
> restrict 127.0.0.1
> restrict server A
> restrict server B
You could simplify this greatly by replacing all of those restrict lines
wit
Martin Burnicki wrote:
> Uwe Klein wrote:
>
>
>>Maarten Wiltink wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I still have a working (when I left it) 386SX-16 with 5 MB RAM. Is
>>>there an NTP port for Windows for Workgroups 3.11?
>>
>>I could offer testing for original win 3.1 on amd386dx5-133 ~20MB Ram ;-)
>
>
> The main
Riccardo wrote:
> restrict default ignore
> restrict 127.0.0.1
> restrict server A
> restrict server B
> server A
> server B
> driftfile /var/lib/ntp/drift
> broadcastdelay 0.008
>
> Can I delete "broadcastdelay" and restrict 127.0.0.1 ?
Did you read the documentation? What does it say?
$ grep
Hal Murray wrote:
>> No. Even the hardware of ten to fifteen years ago has sufficient
>> capacity to run ntpd. I run ntpd on Sun Ultra 10 machines with 440 MHz
>> CPU's (late 1990's vintage).
>
> Are you using PPS? Does your kernel have hardpps?
>
> My question was not whether ntpd would run o
gluino schrieb:
> This was what I was looking for!
>
> http://www.meinberg.de/english/sw/time-server-monitor.htm
> Meinberg's "NTP Time Server Monitor" -- "The NTP Time Server Monitor,
> available for the operating systems Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 Server,
> allows the user to configure and control
This was what I was looking for!
http://www.meinberg.de/english/sw/time-server-monitor.htm
Meinberg's "NTP Time Server Monitor" -- "The NTP Time Server Monitor,
available for the operating systems Windows NT/2000/XP/2003 Server,
allows the user to configure and control the local NTP service with a
Uwe Klein wrote:
> Maarten Wiltink wrote:
>
>> I still have a working (when I left it) 386SX-16 with 5 MB RAM. Is
>> there an NTP port for Windows for Workgroups 3.11?
>
> I could offer testing for original win 3.1 on amd386dx5-133 ~20MB Ram ;-)
The main problem will be that Win 3.1 doesn't pro
Richard,
Richard B. gilbert wrote:
> Martin Burnicki wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> David Woolley wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>>(Linux is OK for a dedicated server, although it can lose clock
>>>ticks if it is doing other things that require disk I/O.)
>>
>>
>> I don't know why this is posted continuously her
Harlan,
Harlan Stenn wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Burnicki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> Maybe the fact that problems are more often reported under Linux
> is Martin> just due to the fact (I guess) there are much more
> installations of Martin> Linux rather th
>No. Even the hardware of ten to fifteen years ago has sufficient
>capacity to run ntpd. I run ntpd on Sun Ultra 10 machines with 440 MHz
>CPU's (late 1990's vintage).
Are you using PPS? Does your kernel have hardpps?
My question was not whether ntpd would run on old machines, but
why the hard
Hi!
I created a helper script which allows me to setup autokey on the server
and on my clients without having to remember all the details and
commandline options.
I put the name "ak_tools" to it and currently this tiny little project
contains one script called ak_tool and a few symbolic links whi
Maarten Wiltink wrote:
> I still have a working (when I left it) 386SX-16 with 5 MB RAM. Is
> there an NTP port for Windows for Workgroups 3.11?
I could offer testing for original win 3.1 on amd386dx5-133 ~20MB Ram ;-)
G!
uwe
___
questions mailing lis
"Richard B. gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [...] I run ntpd on Sun Ultra 10 machines with 440 MHz
> CPU's (late 1990's vintage). You could probably run ntpd on
> an 80486 processor if you:
> a. could still find one and,
> b. could equip it with enough RAM.
Michael L. Semon wrote:
> Spoon wrote:
>
>> Michael L. Semon wrote:
>>
>>> [...] I'm using ntpd's ATOM PPS driver and the LinuxPPS kernel patch
>>> for kernel 2.6.19
>>
>> Could you provide a link to this kernel patch?
>
> It's been a while, but it seems to be here:
>
> http://ftp.enneenne.com/p
I want to use ntpd -qg, it could be right this ntp.conf for my Linux
client ?
restrict default ignore
restrict 127.0.0.1
restrict server A
restrict server B
server A
server B
driftfile /var/lib/ntp/drift
broadcastdelay 0.008
Can i delete "broadcastdelay" and restrict 127.0.0.1 ?
___
22 matches
Mail list logo