Re: [ntp:questions] A Suggestion For Abolishing the Leap Second

2007-06-01 Thread Quadibloc
jlevine wrote: >The proposal to incorporate leap seconds by changing the length of > the > second was tried before in the early days of atomic time. It was not a > very > workable idea then and it would be even more difficult to implement > now. Well, that is entirely possible. I realize that

Re: [ntp:questions] Build Issues - minimum build reqs or vxworks help please...

2007-06-01 Thread Harlan Stenn
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Martin Burnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Harlan, there are 3 locations where memory.h is included without Martin> being bracketed by #ifdef HAVE_MEMORY_H. Martin> Two of those are in instances of compat.h, and 1 in efence.c. I Martin> think they all

Re: [ntp:questions] A Suggestion For Abolishing the Leap Second

2007-06-01 Thread jlevine
Hello, The proposal to incorporate leap seconds by changing the length of the second was tried before in the early days of atomic time. It was not a very workable idea then and it would be even more difficult to implement now. In the first place, the unit of frequency plays a central role in p

Re: [ntp:questions] Build Issues - minimum build reqs or vxworks help please...

2007-06-01 Thread Martin Burnicki
Harlan, there are 3 locations where memory.h is included without being bracketed by #ifdef HAVE_MEMORY_H. Two of those are in instances of compat.h, and 1 in efence.c. I think they all should be fixed in favor of clean code. Martin -- Martin Burnicki Meinberg Funkuhren Bad Pyrmont Germany _