Salutations and Greetings Ladies and Gentlemen,
Where and how does one download the software needed to
synchronize a desktop computer ? I have a desktop with Windows 2000 with
service pack 4. I tried to sign up to the group but the internet location would
not accept my gener
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes:
Danny> Harlan Stenn wrote:
David> Not SNTP - the management protocol SNMP.
>> Ah, I read too quicklky.
>>
>> That is being discussed in the IETF NTP Workgroup.
Danny> No, what's being discussed is the MIB, not the imple
Danny Mayer wrote:
> Steve Kostecke wrote:
>>> does anyone of you have details regarding my original question:
>>> How can i find out which of the sanity-checks failed?
>>
>> I don't think you can.
>
> if the sanity-checks failed it should put out a hex value containing the
> errors detected. You
Charles,
Charles E. LaMonte,n3vuo wrote:
> Salutations and Greetings Ladies and Gentlemen,
>
> Where and how does one download the software needed to
> synchronize a desktop computer ? I have a desktop with
> Windows 2000 with service pack 4.
Danny Mayer wrote:
> Brian Utterback wrote:
>
>> Perhaps proper, but ill-advised. Look at the trouble we have
>> had trying to satisfy that requirement. I am sitting at a
>> system that currently has over 300 UDP ports in use. Exactly
>> one of those UDP ports is bound on each interface, namely
Harlan Stenn wrote:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Danny Mayer) writes:
>
> Danny> Harlan Stenn wrote:
> David> Not SNTP - the management protocol SNMP.
>>> Ah, I read too quicklky.
>>>
>>> That is being discussed in the IETF NTP Workgroup.
>
> Danny> No, what's being di
David J Taylor wrote:
> Danny,
>
> I have tried to follow the build instructions, but they fail at the
> command:
>
> call ms\do_ms
>
Start from the beginning. Delete everything and then reexport the
compressed tar file. The top-level directory (openssl-0.9.8g) should be
at the same level as
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> David J Taylor wrote:
>> Danny Mayer wrote:
>> []
>>
>>> No, you extract the openssl files to a directory at the same level as
>>> ntp. Then you read the INSTALL.W32 file for instructions on how to
>>> build openssl. I don't build with the assembler code.
>>
>> Danny, th
David J Taylor schrieb:
> Does NTP include SNMP support (on Windows), and if not, are there any
> plans to add support?
>
> Thanks,
> David
When the MIB for NTP has been standardized, I will try to write a module for
net-snmp which supports that standard NTPv4 MIB. Our current NTP server
appl
Heiko Gerstung wrote:
> David J Taylor schrieb:
>> Does NTP include SNMP support (on Windows), and if not, are there any
>> plans to add support?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> David
>
> When the MIB for NTP has been standardized, I will try to write a
> module for net-snmp which supports that standard NTPv4 MIB
Danny Mayer wrote:
> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>
>>David J Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>Danny Mayer wrote:
>>>[]
>>>
>>>
No, you extract the openssl files to a directory at the same level as
ntp. Then you read the INSTALL.W32 file for instructions on how to
build openssl. I don't build with the
Danny Mayer wrote:
[]
> Start from the beginning. Delete everything and then reexport the
> compressed tar file. The top-level directory (openssl-0.9.8g) should
> be at the same level as the version of NTP that you are going to use.
>
> Run the following lines at the command-line prompt when you ha
David J Taylor schrieb:
> Heiko Gerstung wrote:
>> David J Taylor schrieb:
>>> Does NTP include SNMP support (on Windows), and if not, are there any
>>> plans to add support?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> David
>> When the MIB for NTP has been standardized, I will try to write a
>> module for net-snmp which
I went back to your original message and re-read it. I think the
problem here is in the phrase "property of all RPC protocols
[...] that use addresses to match requests with responses."
What is not clear and what the original poster is in fact asking,
is whether or not NTP is such a protocol that
Heiko Gerstung wrote:
[]
> People often tend to say that NTPQ already offers all they need, but
> the core idea behind SNMP (IMHO) is that you need only one piece of
> software to monitor your routers, servers, printers, coffee machines
> and, yes, time servers.
> Since SNMP is to network monitorin
Danny:>Don't. Just have the Linux servers point to external servers
like the
>pool and then you don't have to change anything later. You are likely to
>get better quality time service that way.
Suj: That is an option but the mgmt wants as few open ports on the
prod linux servers as possible. So I
16 matches
Mail list logo
