In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David L. Mills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Same time I changed in step with common electrical engineering practice
>from capacitator to capacitor, yea from megacycle to megahertz.
Yeah but a megahertz crossing the wheatstone bridge just isn't as
funny.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I don't want to step on anyones toes but I am getting
>a lot of heat over using a POSIX compliant ntp re leap
>seconds. The 1 second error inserted can cause a lot
>of trouble.
Exactly what heat are you getting and what trouble is it causing you?
Perhaps if you tell u
We use a pc punchclock that relies on the "net time" command. We are
a netware/linux shop and use an ntp time source, however, we do not
use Active Directory. So far have been unable to make the punchclock
work. Is there any way we can respond with the time when the
punchclock requests "net time
Greg,
Same time I changed in step with common electrical engineering practice
from capacitator to capacitor, yea from megacycle to megahertz.
Dave
Greg Dowd wrote:
> When did this change from proventic to provenentic? Or has all the
> eggnog made me fuzzy?
>
>
>
> provenentic. Formally, this i
"Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Unruh wrote:
>> "Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>A good way to learn what's good and bad is to use a hardware reference
>>>clock such as a GPS receiver. A timing receiver with PPS output will
>>>generally keep t
I don't want to step on anyones toes but I am getting
a lot of heat over using a POSIX compliant ntp re leap
seconds. The 1 second error inserted can cause a lot
of trouble.
I now that the Olsen mod changes most Unix/Linux time
processing to handle the leap second in a
theoretically correct mann
Unruh wrote:
> "Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ...
>
>>A good way to learn what's good and bad is to use a hardware reference
>>clock such as a GPS receiver. A timing receiver with PPS output will
>>generally keep the leading edge of the PPS within 50 microseconds of the
>
"Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
>A good way to learn what's good and bad is to use a hardware reference
>clock such as a GPS receiver. A timing receiver with PPS output will
>generally keep the leading edge of the PPS within 50 microseconds of the
>"top of the second". The
Spoon wrote:
> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Spoon wrote:
>>
>>> ntpd kicked my clock forward one second on January 1 at 00:19:38 UTC.
>>>
>>> (My ntp.conf lists 12 servers. Delays range from 28 to 48 ms.)
>>
>>
>> Unless you have a custom version of ntpd,
>
>
> I didn't modify the source in an
Brian Utterback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Unruh wrote:
>> I have a very weird situation. I am running a GPS PPS (Garmin GPS18LVM)
>> with a few machines as a backup/initialization.
>>
>> Sudeenly for about half and hour, my GPS failed for some reason ( still do
>> not know what was wrong sinc
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> Spoon wrote:
>
>> ntpd kicked my clock forward one second on January 1 at 00:19:38 UTC.
>>
>> (My ntp.conf lists 12 servers. Delays range from 28 to 48 ms.)
>
> Unless you have a custom version of ntpd,
I didn't modify the source in any way.
> I believe that ten se
When did this change from proventic to provenentic? Or has all the
eggnog made me fuzzy?
provenentic. Formally, this is the relation formed from the transitive
closure of the authentic relation. This comes from Autokey slang.
Greg Dowd
gdowd at symmetricom dot com (antispam format)
Symme
On 2008-01-01, Tony Rutkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Danny,
>
>>What are you referring to? Your message doesn't say anything.
>
> [ntp:questions] M'I-5'Per secution ' abuse in set- up situa tions
> an d in p ublic
>
> By any measure, this guy is off topic and
> over the top.
>
>
On 2008-01-02, Danny Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tony Rutkowski wrote:
>
>> ATTRIBUTION MISSING wrote:
>>
>>> What are you referring to? Your message doesn't say anything.
>>
>> [ntp:questions] M'I-5'Per secution ' abuse in set- up situa tions an
>> d in p ublic
>>
>> By any measure, this g
Hi Brian,
Sorry I missed that last email. It was hectic towards the end of
the year. We use plenty of 2.6 linux with the board. If you know how to
write linux kernel drivers, it's a slam dunk. If you don't, it's still
pretty straightforward. First and foremost, read online or buy the
Linux
Spoon wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> ntpd kicked my clock forward one second on January 1 at 00:19:38 UTC.
>
> (My ntp.conf lists 12 servers. Delays range from 28 to 48 ms.)
>
Unless you have a custom version of ntpd, I believe that ten servers is
the absolute maximum! I believe that ntpd will
Hello everyone,
ntpd kicked my clock forward one second on January 1 at 00:19:38 UTC.
(My ntp.conf lists 12 servers. Delays range from 28 to 48 ms.)
Dec 31 23:25:39 offset 0.000329 sec freq -6.715 ppm error 0.000333 poll 8
Dec 31 23:28:39 offset 0.000329 sec freq -6.715 ppm error 0.000340 poll 8
"cookie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello-
>I have been messing with my old Symmetricom bc635PCI-U,
> and was wondering if anyone on the list was successfully
> using it with NTP/Linux 2.6.
Take a look at reference clock #16
(http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills
Unruh wrote:
> I have a very weird situation. I am running a GPS PPS (Garmin GPS18LVM)
> with a few machines as a backup/initialization.
>
> Sudeenly for about half and hour, my GPS failed for some reason ( still do
> not know what was wrong since it had come back on air by the time I noticed
> s
BBC. h2g2 16/Sept/1999
The BBC's. h2g2 website is billed as "Earth Edition of The Hitchhiker's Guide
to the Galaxy!". Naturally, one of its pages
is about me, me,. me. It starts off with the lines;
Every now. and then something comes along which makes you
think "Ah! That's what the Internet. i
Hi,
Folkert van Heusden wrote:
> While going through the documentation we found that the "Conrad parallel
> port radio clock" driver has a default offset calibration factor of
> 0.1725s.
> Why is that specific factor chosen?
I bet this has been determined by a measurement. The DCF77 amplitude is
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-= harassment at. work -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Once I stopped watching television and listening to the radio at. the end of
1990, "they" had to find other ways of committing abuses. So they took. what
must be for them a tried and tested. route; they get at you by subve
22 matches
Mail list logo
