David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Unruh wrote:
>>
>> This is in the clock_filter algorithm. It selects the sample of the last 8
>> which has the lowest delay (suitably aged) If that sample is the most
>Yes. That's what I am talking about. Specifically clock_filter in
>ntp_proto.c.
>
David,
We are talking right past each other and are not having a productive
discussion. Tge best choice for me is just to shut up.
Dave
David Woolley wrote:
> David L. Mills wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> This is really silly. The Unruh agenda is clear. Should you choose to
>
>
> I think you repl
Unrug,
You are not accurately describing the ntpd clock filter. An accurate
desciption would surely help the point you are making.
Davde
Unruh wrote:
> Grian Utterback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>David J Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>Brian Utterback wrote:
>>>[]
>>>
Which is why NTP prefers
David,
Can we take a time out? Can you read the NTPv4 specification where it
describes the system process? Our disussion would be much more
productive after that.
Dave
David Woolley wrote:
> David L. Mills wrote:
>
>> David,
>>
>> I don't know what you mean by "figure head", but this is proba
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 02:33:09 +, Danny Mayer wrote:
> You should at least upgrade to 4.2.4. The refid garbage on the line for
> prometheus was fixed a long time ago.
I just did. It was less trivial than I wanted, as the debian repositories
get updated very slowly. 4.2.2. is the latest and grea
Unruh wrote:
>
> This is in the clock_filter algorithm. It selects the sample of the last 8
> which has the lowest delay (suitably aged) If that sample is the most
Yes. That's what I am talking about. Specifically clock_filter in
ntp_proto.c.
> recent, then it is actually used. Otherwise noth
David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Unruh wrote:
>>
>> Worse than that . Only if the latest sample is the one with the min delay
>> is it chosen Otherwise it is not. You can go for 16 or more samples never
>> using any of thembefor one fits the criteion. (actually the samples are
>> aged
Unruh wrote:
>
> Worse than that . Only if the latest sample is the one with the min delay
> is it chosen Otherwise it is not. You can go for 16 or more samples never
> using any of thembefor one fits the criteion. (actually the samples are
> aged as well-- ie the delay is increased as they get o
"David L. Mills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Guys,
>This is really silly. The Unruh agenda is clear. Should you choose to
>limit the application space to fast local networks, the chrony choice
>may or may not be optimal. Should you extend this space to the raunchy
>global Internet, conviction
Grian Utterback <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>David J Taylor wrote:
>> Brian Utterback wrote:
>> []
>>> Which is why NTP prefers the source with the smallest delay. The
>>> system I am using has servers whose delays are 51ms to 94. I can't
>>> find any closer. On my company LAN, the delays range fr
> You mean from Fort Collins? I'm about 1495 km from there.
>
> I'll generate some plots and post links to them in a few days, after
> enough data has been gathered. I probably should have done that from the
> beginning.
Sorry - I meant Fort Collins (right State though!). Look forward to seei
David L. Mills wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This is really silly. The Unruh agenda is clear. Should you choose to
I think you replied to the wrong node in the thread. I think what you
are actually doing is telling Steve that he shouldn't be asking for
these changes to included in ntpd at all.
Also, I
David L. Mills wrote:
> David,
>
> I don't know what you mean by "figure head", but this is probably what
I meant that it is the one peer chosen to represent all the peers
actually used.
> is intended. The statistics such as root delay, root dispersion and
> related statistics are in fact inh
13 matches
Mail list logo
