Maarten Wiltink wrote:
> "David Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> stratum
>> root distance
>> root dispersion
>> system peer
>> local reference time
>> leap bits
>> etc.
>
> Yes. Those are all client-part statistics that could easily be made
> available to
Unruh wrote:
> that is why there is a proposed file system standard.
> Log files in /var/log/ntp say.
> Drift file in /etc/ntp.drift
> config file in /etc/ntp.conf
>
I think they were referring to the Linux filesystem standard, and one of
the things that does is to move things out of /etc. In
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> Anybody who runs a "packaged" configuration deserves whatever happens to
> him. Windows comes configured to use time.windows.com. AFAIK that's
Most people run packaged systems these days. When they go wrong, they
will not RTFM, or ask the packager. They come her
Ryan,
Ryan Malayter wrote:
> Okay, I just did some packet captures. It appears that Vista, when
> configured *only* with a time server host name or IP address, will
> first issue an NTP client mode request, and then an NTP symmetric
> active requirest a few miliseconds later.
>
> I imagine this d
Dave,
David L. Mills wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Thanks for the reminder. In the six years hence the code has gone
> through a number of securiy audits and defensive adjustments, one or
> more of which might have plugged the hole. The code at time.nist.gov is
> 4.1.1b, which must be before 4.1.1c, dated
> From: David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 08:11:23 +
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Unruh wrote:
>
> > that is why there is a proposed file system standard.
> > Log files in /var/log/ntp say.
> > Drift file in /etc/ntp.drift
> > config file in /etc/ntp.conf
> >
"David Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Maarten Wiltink wrote:
>> "David Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> stratum
>>> root distance
>>> root dispersion
>>> system peer
>>> local reference time
>>> leap bits
>>> etc.
>
David Woolley wrote:
> Unruh wrote:
>
>> that is why there is a proposed file system standard. Log files in
>> /var/log/ntp say.
>> Drift file in /etc/ntp.drift
>> config file in /etc/ntp.conf
>>
>
> I think they were referring to the Linux filesystem standard, and one of
> the things that does
David Woolley wrote:
> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Anybody who runs a "packaged" configuration deserves whatever happens
>> to him. Windows comes configured to use time.windows.com. AFAIK that's
>
>
>
> Most people run packaged systems these days. When they go wrong, they
> will not RTF
Martin,
Maybe so, but when I tried both XP and Vista before the change I
mentioned, both timed out and did not work.
Dave
Martin Burnicki wrote:
> Ryan,
>
> Ryan Malayter wrote:
>
>>Okay, I just did some packet captures. It appears that Vista, when
>>configured *only* with a time server host
Martin,
Thanks for the link. What astonishes me is that, while Microsoft clearly
understands the issue, they refuse to change the default. I cling to my
conclusion this is a purposeful attempt to enhance product differentiation.
The workaround is clearly dangerous for the general application an
Maartin and others,
The intended model for monitoring and control is clearly articulated in
the control and monitoring protocol defined in rfc 1305. This model
provides status words and event codes explicitly designed for remote
access and as a demarcation between the idiosyncratic inner workin
David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>> Anybody who runs a "packaged" configuration deserves whatever happens to
>> him. Windows comes configured to use time.windows.com. AFAIK that's
>Most people run packaged systems these days. When they go wrong, they
>wi
Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Martin, at the risk of repeating what I said in a recent similar reply,
> the information you seek (with the exception of Dave's email/newsgroup
> postings) should already be in the CommitLog file.
.. which doesn't make it easier for non-developers to find out whether a
speci
"Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>David Woolley wrote:
>> Unruh wrote:
>>
>>> that is why there is a proposed file system standard. Log files in
>>> /var/log/ntp say.
>>> Drift file in /etc/ntp.drift
>>> config file in /etc/ntp.conf
>>>
>>
>> I think they were referring to the L
Martin Burnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Koos,
>Koos van den Hout wrote:
>> If you just want to adjust the server they contact for syncing (and not
>> the other settings) you could modify the local dns (if you control that)
>> to make 'time.windows.com' point to your local timeserver.
>Thoug
But doesn't symmetric association require authorization or is it only
true when there's a keys file?
I ask because after following this thread, I noticed that NTP running
on our NAS had three Windows XP systems as peers. Luckily, their
jitter sucked and being themselves synchronized to the NAS th
> >File System Standard? What's that?? Unix tends to put things in
> >more or less standard places but it's not guaranteed that system
> >A's file system or directory naming will be compatible with system
> >B. Once you
> that is why there is a proposed file system standard.
But there are so
David L. Mills wrote:
> Maartin and others,
>
> The intended model for monitoring and control is clearly articulated in
> the control and monitoring protocol defined in rfc 1305. This model
I can't speak for Maartin, but I was talking about the operation of the
protocol itself. The values in
Maarten Wiltink wrote:
>
> An SNTP or local clock server might have to make some of them up.
> System peer? Root dispersion?
A conforming SNTP server is required to have a locally attached
reference clock. The only other situation in which SNTP is allowed is
where only the client is SNTP, but
David Woolley wrote:
> Venu Gopal wrote:
>
>> Its clear that CPU is heavily loaded which might be leading to loss of
>> ticks. Yet to check the DMA status for
>
> CPU loading doesn't cause lost timer interrupts. (More precisely
> overruns.)
>
So its the DISK I/O thats causing loss of ticks ?
21 matches
Mail list logo
