On 2008-04-12, Ryan Malayter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 12, 12:29 am, Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The server operator has set a 'noquery' restriction.
>
> I'll try to pre-emptively answer the next question, [which] is likely to
> be "why would they do that?"
>
> The ans
On 2008-04-12, Richard B. Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW, if you didn't wait at least 30 minutes between starting ntpd and
> getting the ntpq banner, you wasted your time!
Nonsense.
After only two polls you can see if your ntpd is able to contact the
remote time servers. You don't nee
>The problem here is that the distribution does not contain a decent
>assortment of example configuration files for common configurations. So
>the OS distributors/aggregators/vendors each cobble together their own
>one size fits all configuration file.
But does a local refclock make sense in a ty
On 2008-04-12, David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
>> Why do you have a local refclock configured?
>
> Because he's using an out of the box configuration. That, is probably
> the main reason that people have them configured. You really need to
> ask the people who put
Harlan Stenn wrote:
>
> Why do you have a local refclock configured?
Because he's using an out of the box configuration. That, is probably
the main reason that people have them configured. You really need to
ask the people who put in the box, but I suspect they don't know, either.
__
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Richard B. Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> writes:
Richard> BTW, if you didn't wait at least 30 minutes between starting ntpd
Richard> and getting the ntpq banner, you wasted your time! Ntpd generally
Richard> requires about that much time to figure out exac
Tony,
Why do you have a local refclock configured?
Why are you not using the 'iburst' keyword on your server lines?
Have you seen http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/ConfiguringNTP ?
--
Harlan Stenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ntpforum.isc.org - be a member!
__
On 2008-04-12, David Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I have ntpd installed (ntpq [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 15:13:06 UTC
>> 2007
>
> That is not a standard version number.
Really? On my system running 4.2.5p54 built from sources downloaded from
www.ntp.org I se
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I have ntpd installed (ntpq [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 15:13:06 UTC 2007
> (1) and running but the time on the ntp host does not appear to be
> synching with the nominated external time references. Any assistance much
> appreciated.
>
> Details as f
On Apr 12, 12:29 am, Steve Kostecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The server operator has set a 'noquery' restriction.
I'll try to pre-emptively answer the next question, whcih is likely to
be "why would they do that?"
The answer is security. On our network, we follow the principle of
least privel
On Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 18:18:15 +, Unruh wrote:
> But when one is advising someone, one must assume that they have at
> least the typical if not the worst condition
That's not false...
> How in the world did you the power off drift to 5 significant figures?
With two hwclock --syst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have ntpd installed (ntpq [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 4 15:13:06 UTC 2007
That is not a standard version number. Who allocated the "@1.1570-o"
part of the version number? You may be better off getting support from
them.
> (1) and running but the time on the ntp h
>Do you know any code that cares if that is wrong by 10% (which would be
>10PPM) Ie, is 10% error insane?
>Is 1% (1PPM)?
>Ie, .05% seems a bit extreme for that.
I used to do a lot of performance measurements.
For the stuff I was doing, 10% is easy to spot. 1% is borderline.
--
These
On Thursday, April 10, 2008 at 18:02:38 +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> This holds the clock for up to a second
> I am not sure what you mean
Anyway I experimented a little: This doesn't seem to work as I hoped.
And it can even lock the clock, requiring a oscillator reset. :-(
The idea was a
Ginni Misra wrote:
> I am trying to use NTP in peer configuration.
No. You are trying to use NTP in an orphaned configuration, which has
never had any parents! NTP was not designed for that, although recent
additions (ophan mode) make it just about workable.
Timed was designed for that, so
Unruh wrote:
>
> Do you know any code that cares if that is wrong by 10% (which would be
> 10PPM) Ie, is 10% error insane?
>
RTP.
Anything measuring speeds based on crossing starting and ending thresholds.
___
questions mailing list
questions@lis
16 matches
Mail list logo
