John,
In the modem string ATB1&C0&D2E0L1M1Q0V1 the E0 turns off command
echoing. However, I see apparent echoicing anyway. In response to that
string, the program expects an OK and nothing else. What came back
appears to be a broken fragment of the setup string. You may need to
fiddle the mode
Aah. Good point Dave. I remember that USRobotics Sportster external
modems had dip switches. That was always an issue for us as the
switches took precedence over software commands. Maybe that's the case
here John?
Greg Dowd
gdowd at symmetricom dot com (antispam format)
Symmetricom, Inc.
www.
Greg Dowd wrote:
> Aah. Good point Dave. I remember that USRobotics Sportster external
> modems had dip switches. That was always an issue for us as the
> switches took precedence over software commands. Maybe that's the case
> here John?
>
My recollection (It's been almost ten years since I
Yes you are right we are running RHEL5. The strange thing is that when
we try to sync the servers from a location that syncs correctly normally
to the location with the issues then we get the same issues as the local
servers are experiencing. You say that it could be conflicting time
synchronisatio
Hi,
I am new to the group, appreciate if you could answer a couple of queries I
have
Recently in one of my setups, I got this message continuously.
too many recvbufs allocated (40) - ntpd
I checked the code(ntp-4.2.0a) and found that ntpd has 40 recv buffers
allocated for the recv packets.
My
Dear List,
i´m having slight problems getting ntp to synchronize.
The problem i am facing occur on all my new 6 servers
which are all equally configured (Red Hat AS 4 U4, 64-bit).
The associations to all ntp servers are in state "reject".
The ntp.conf configuration file:
restrict default nomo
> David Woolley wrote:
> > Anton Persson A wrote:
>
> > I've been trying to figure out a couple of details during the last
few
> > days concerning NTP/ntpd. I now have the following unanswered
> > questions.
> >
> > * The ntpdc -> kerninfo -> status bits, are these set
> > by NTP when it cons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kiran Shirol) writes:
>Hi,
>I am new to the group, appreciate if you could answer a couple of queries I
>have
>Recently in one of my setups, I got this message continuously.
>too many recvbufs allocated (40) - ntpd
>I checked the code(ntp-4.2.0a) and found that ntpd has 40 r
>>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kiran Shirol) writes:
Kiran> Recently in one of my setups, I got this message continuously.
Kiran> too many recvbufs allocated (40) - ntpd
Kiran> I checked the code(ntp-4.2.0a) and found that ntpd has 40 recv
Kiran> buffers allocated for the
Adam Johnson wrote:
[]
> You say that it could be
> conflicting time synchronisation mechanisms, do you mean that the 2
> upstream servers are conflicting or that something other than NTP is
> causing this? Thank you for your help!
>
> Thanks
>
> Adam
Adam,
Two servers prevents NTP working as des
10 matches
Mail list logo
