> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> >> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Having an issue and its really perplexing. Its a bit of a read,
> >>> so maybe you'll want to go for a dinner break first...
> >>>
> >>> The story starts out with a FreeBSD 4.X system (Its my personal
> >>> server,
Grzegorz,
Be advised the ntpdc program has long ago fallen in disrepair and is not
to be maintained further. In particular, the feature to add, remove and
modify remote associations is not consistent with current manycast and
pool autoconfigure provisions. The ntpq program is intended as
repla
Kiran,
I say yet once again, the event reporting is specific to the particular
verision. The version you cite preceeds the development version, so the
web documentation does not apply to you. I say for the third time you
may find help in your specific version using the comments in the
libntp/s
David,
You quote the sampling theorem, which is a little more powerful than
Nyquist. However, you are correct in that the NTP filter is not
brick-wall. To compensate for that, the minimum sampling rate is at
least twice the Nyquist rate. Having said all that, the proof is in the
very many simu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Grzegorz Daniluk) writes:
>Steve Kostecke wrote:
>> On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you very much, that is exactly what I was looking for.
>>> Now I have another question. I would like to change the poll interval
>>> for those 'noselec
Steve Kostecke pisze:
> On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're complicating matters by using ntpdc.
>
> Just edit the server lines in ntpd.conf and restart ntpd. If you're
> using iburst on the other server lines ntpd will be ready to answer
> polls about 15 seconds aft
On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Kostecke wrote:
>
>> On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> You're trying to do things the hard way.
>>
>> Read the documentation about "maxpoll" (hint: go to
>> http://doc.ntp.org and search for maxpoll)
Steve Kostecke wrote:
> On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thank you very much, that is exactly what I was looking for.
>> Now I have another question. I would like to change the poll interval
>> for those 'noselect' hosts so I figured out that I'll use ntpdc. Then
On 2008-07-23, Grzegorz Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Kostecke wrote:
>> You can include reference time sources in your ntp.conf
>>
>> The syntax is:
>>
>> server your.reference.server noselect
>>
>
> Thank you very much, that is exactly what I was looking for.
> Now I have another
Dave,
I am using ntp-4.2.0a in my setup. I see the event named "EVNT_SYNCCHG" in
the code.
As per your suggestion, I checked the latest code, this event seems to be
depricated. I dont see this EVNT_SYNCCHG
in ntp.h.
My requirement is this,
I want to listen to EVNT_SYNCHG and then do some cal
Steve Kostecke wrote:
> You can include reference time sources in your ntp.conf
>
> The syntax is:
>
> server your.reference.server noselect
>
Thank you very much, that is exactly what I was looking for.
Now I have another question. I would like to change the poll interval
for those 'noselect'
blu wrote:
>
> Okay, so how is the bandwidth equal to the inverse TC, and is that the
> TC as in 3 or as in 2^3=7? I don't understand the meaning of the term
The time constant as linear time, i.e. 8.
> bandwidth in this context. And when you say that it works even if you
ntpd implements a phas
12 matches
Mail list logo
