Towli wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a
> public ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our
> domain time is not synchronised properly).
> Is there a way to do this?
>
> Bst rgds from Denmark
> /T
I wrote a simple program to do
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> Towli wrote:
>> Thank you!
>> It seems that ntpd is a Unix-thing though. Does something similar
>> exist to xp?
>>
>
>
> Ntpd runs under Unix, Linux, OpenVMS, Windows/XP (and possibly other
> versions (W/2K and V/Vista are the likeliest suspects)) and possibly
> operati
Dave Hart wrote:
> In David J Taylor's specific case, on reflection, the CPU temp might
> be a close enough proxy. David runs that machine with a near-constant
> CPU load (around 20% I believe) so the CPU heat output should be
> pretty steady and the major influence on core temp would presumably b
On Mar 19, 7:38 am, "David J Taylor" wrote:
> Towli wrote:
> > Hi
>
> > I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a
> > public ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our
> > domain time is not synchronised properly).
> > Is there a way to do this?
>
> > Bs
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> Towli wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a
>> public ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our
>> domain time is not synchronised properly).
>> Is there a way to do this?
>>
>> Bst rgds from Denmar
Dave Hart wrote:
[]
> I updated the satsignal.eu NTPplotter beta when I still could not find
> _*.png files being saved by the Save button. There's a new knob to
> control the period over which the jitter running average is
> calculated, which most likely means the average jitter line isn't
> dire
Towli wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a
> public ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our domain
> time is not synchronised properly).
> Is there a way to do this?
Just for a quick test you can run
ntpdate -qb server
from a
Rob wrote:
[]
> When somebody asks a question about a Windows system, where a native
> NTP implementation is available that can be debugged with a simple
> commandline program (w32tm), the response to any question invariably
> is to "install ntpd".
>
> It may have some advantages, but is it really
Dave Hart wrote:
[]
> Tiny Ben is a simple program. [1] NTPmonitor is a bit less simple.
> Tiny Ben meets superscientist who's into shaving seconds and
> cloning :)
[]
> [1] http://www.satsignal.eu/software/disk.html#TinyBen
[]
> Cheers,
> Dave Hart
Tiny Ben is a simple analog clock program. It
Rob wrote:
[]
> What I want to state is: somebody has a Windows domain and is asking
> how
> he can check if its time is similar to some external ntp server.
> Windows provides the w32tm command with the /monitor flag that
> accomplishes exactly that. The user did not ask how he could get
> better
David J Taylor wrote:
> Rob wrote:
> []
>> What I want to state is: somebody has a Windows domain and is asking
>> how
>> he can check if its time is similar to some external ntp server.
>> Windows provides the w32tm command with the /monitor flag that
>> accomplishes exactly that. The user did n
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> Some Unix and Linux distributions include a version of NTPD but not
> necessarily an up-to-date version.
(active) Linux Distributions ( and the BSDs ?) come with adequately
recent versions of ntpd ( even when LSB conventions masked this with
the usage of "xntp*" for t
Rob wrote:
> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>> Towli wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a
>>> public ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our
>>> domain time is not synchronised properly).
>>> Is there a way to do this?
>>>
>>>
David J Taylor wrote:
> Rob wrote:
> []
>> When somebody asks a question about a Windows system, where a native
>> NTP implementation is available that can be debugged with a simple
>> commandline program (w32tm), the response to any question invariably
>> is to "install ntpd".
>>
>> It may have s
Rob wrote:
[]
> I wanted to describe the general situation seen on this group, not
> really the particular responses that you gave. There were several
> replies that suggested to first install different software.
Probably best to start a new topic, then.
Cheers,
David
__
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> W32TM is NOT the equivalent of ntpd! W32TM simply asks "what time is
> it?" and unconditionally believes the answer it gets. It does use the
> NTP protocol.
You need to update your knowledge. Since Windows XP and 2003 this is
no longer true.
(and then I am not ev
"Richard B. Gilbert" writes:
>Rob wrote:
...
>> It almost seems like a religious group. Most people try to convert
>> the world to Mills' NTPD, and then there is the dissident who tries
>> to push Chrony in every thread.
>>
>I think I see people following you, carrying torches and fagots.
>>
On 2009-03-19, Rob wrote:
> But [the Microsoft implementation of] NTP [for Windows] is perfectly
> capable of doing [something].
>
> I am not trying to convince people to use Windows or the w32time
> service, but I disagree with the opinion that it does not work, uses
> sntp only, or leads to tim
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Rob wrote:
> Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
>> Towli wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I would like to test my internal clock (from my domain pc) against a
>>> public ntp server, to see if there is a discrepance (i suspect our
>>> domain time is not synchronised properly).
>>> Is there a wa
Rob wrote:
>
> What I want to state is: somebody has a Windows domain and is asking how
> he can check if its time is similar to some external ntp server.
> Windows provides the w32tm command with the /monitor flag that accomplishes
Does it? Maybe it does, but the Technet documentation is prett
And I have been remiss in not expressing my thanks
to Dr. Mills for his efforts over the last several
months.
Dr. Mills, you did a *great* job of updating the
dev tree. Many improvements, and you knocked one
of my (simplistic) attacks on its head. Crypto-
nak cleanup and all that. sigh. have to lo
Rob wrote:
> When somebody asks a question about a Windows system, where a native
> NTP implementation is available that can be debugged with a simple
> commandline program (w32tm), the response to any question invariably
> is to "install ntpd".
One key factor is that Microsoft never post to this
Richard,
Please be more tolerant.
Some of us *vastly* prefer top-posted articles.
Let's just agree to disagree about this, and stop lobbying for our personal
preferences.
H
--
>>> In article , "Richard B.
>>> Gilbert" writes:
Richard> Towli wrote:
>> Wau - Thank you ! i bellieve thats exact
hun...@comcast.net (Rob Neal) writes:
>>
>> It almost seems like a religious group. Most people try to convert
>> the world to Mills' NTPD, and then there is the dissident who tries
>> to push Chrony in every thread.
> Chrony has an impulse response that is ill-advised in
> a network
Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Please be more tolerant.
>
> Some of us *vastly* prefer top-posted articles.
>
> Let's just agree to disagree about this, and stop lobbying for our personal
> preferences.
>
> H
> --
In article , "Richard B.
Gilbert" writes:
>
> Richard> Towli wro
"Richard B. Gilbert" writes:
>Harlan Stenn wrote:
>> Richard,
>>
>> Please be more tolerant.
>>
>> Some of us *vastly* prefer top-posted articles.
>>
>> Let's just agree to disagree about this, and stop lobbying for our personal
>> preferences.
>>
>> H
>> --
> In article , "Richard B.
>>
On 2009-03-20, Unruh wrote:
> And it makes even more sense to have it at the top so that I can see that
> the response is totally off topic without having to scroll through the
> whole rest of the ancient history of the post.
A good writer, who is considerate of his readers, will take the time
Rob Neal wrote:
[various examples]
Rob,
You are finding that there are strong-minded individuals in this
newsgroup, and that while some of their opinions are quite valid, others
are out-of-date, and now incorrect. Dig deeper and you may discover the
history of why they hold those views.
I
Steve Kostecke wrote:
[]
> A good writer, who is considerate of his readers, will take the time
> necessary to edit the quoted material in an article (as I have done in
> this case) to focus on the salient material.
>
> http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Agreed. To me, it makes much
29 matches
Mail list logo
