On 2009-06-21, Allen Kistler wrote:
> Steve Kostecke wrote:
>
>> I have an IPv6 tunnel through Hurricane Electric and have _no_ problems
>> with IPv6 to *.ntp.org
>
> Interesting. traceroute (tcp, udp, and icmp) says:
>
> 1 2002:638e:214e:1::1 (2002:638e:214e:1::1)
> 2 2002:c058:6301:: (2
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
[]
> I'd guess that someone installed NTPD and neglected to configure it.
> I've never rung NTPD on Windows so I'm hazy on the details of
> configuring it on Windows.
The Meinberg installation includes configuration by default, using some
pool servers.
> Most other syst
W. eWatson wrote:
> I've read the above.
>
> I'm using Win2000. My use is personal.
>
> When I checked the task mgr, I found ntpd.exe is running.
> Meinberg was installed, and available through Start->Programs. I ran the
> status program from there and it opened a DOS window that was running
>
I've read the above.
I'm using Win2000. My use is personal.
When I checked the task mgr, I found ntpd.exe is running.
Meinberg was installed, and available through Start->Programs. I ran the
status program from there and it opened a DOS window that was running ntpq
-p. It showed "No association
Steve Kostecke wrote:
> On 2009-06-19, Rick Jones wrote:
>
>> Allen Kistler wrote:
>>
>>> For example, http://www.ntp.org.
>>> NTP.org has a perfectly good IPv4 site, but the IPv6 site doesn't
>>> answer to SYNs.
>
> ???
tcpdump says:
14:33:53.083303 IP6 2002:638e:214e:1:20b:cdff:fe8b:1495.57
Rob wrote:
> j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> John Hasler wrote:
>>> Jim Pennino writes:
If you limit the problem to Olson, the problem was solved years ago at:
ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/
>>>
>>> Until they have a budget cut, a server reorganization, decide the traffic
>>> is exc
David Woolley wrote:
> j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> David Woolley wrote:
>>> j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>
What about all the systems that don't use Olson?
>>> I'm only aware of one that doesn't require the system administrator to
>>> manually configure for any zone that
Rob wrote:
> And you keep ingnoring the fact that timezone info is not just about
> OS vendors. NTP is a protcol that can be used by anything that wants
> to keep correct time, not only by a computer system running a commercial
> OS.
This is "localisation" and the TZ* element is only one small
On Jun 20, 1:42 pm, "W. eWatson" wrote:
> In some science working I'm doing, I need subsecond accuracy for
> timestamps. I was told the s/w in the Subject will do the trick. Maybe
> someone has used it before. I have little to go on, but installed it
> successfully yesterday--I think. I gave it t
j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> Jim Pennino writes:
>>> If you limit the problem to Olson, the problem was solved years ago at:
>>> ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/
>>
>> Until they have a budget cut, a server reorganization, decide the traffic
>> is excessive, or just get b
j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> David Woolley wrote:
>> j...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>
>>> What about all the systems that don't use Olson?
>>>
>> I'm only aware of one that doesn't require the system administrator to
>> manually configure for any zone that that doesn't match the (histori
11 matches
Mail list logo
